Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 028

gun*** observes that discussions and awareness regarding the Brady rule have begun circulating widely across multiple chat groups.

gun*** asserts without doubt that many establishment insiders are present within their ranks.

reb*** argues that if this reflects organized action by the Chinese Communist Party, it would bring the party under RICO statutes.

sar*** contends that an April claim form set a trap by having applicants check a victim petition under Section III instead of an 853(n) third-party filing, turning registered creditors into criminal case victims.

ntp*** urges posting about the filing discrepancy on Twitter.

ntp*** argues that Judge Manning's bankruptcy court effectively cripples the defense by draining financial resources, making it hard to pay for attorneys and interpreters.

ntp*** observes that Judge Torres restricted third-party intervention to 853(n) and the CVRA in ECF 528, while noting that Zhu Beibei successfully uploaded pro se motions under ECF 526 and ECF 709.

ntp*** questions whether non-party submissions of Brady evidence by interested stakeholders would be summarily rejected by Judge Torres pursuant to ECF 528.

him*** argues that procedural injustices, pro se motions, and exposing fabricated creditor claims by trustee Luc could overturn the prosecution's case and force a retrial.

ntp*** points out that ECF 51 and ECF 216 are bail denial filings and suggests examining the prosecution's specific arguments in them.

rui*** asks which docket filing contains the prosecution's claim regarding frequent communications with trustee Luc's creditors.

rui*** urges fellow participants to locate evidence showing the prosecution knowingly relied on false information to defraud the judge.

zci*** contends that group members are largely unconcerned with recovering money, making recovery discussions irrelevant off-topic talk.

rui*** asks whether the chat group is solely dedicated to discussing whether Guo can be released.

ntp*** argues that events occurring after Guo was incarcerated have nothing to do with him anyway.

rui*** asks how many members in the chat group belong to the Korea Farm.

rui*** contends that members ought to demand repayment directly from Ha En and Changhai.

hon*** agrees with the logic and argues that members should submit evidence to court documenting fraud by Ha En and Changhai.

rui*** remarks that group members will hopefully still be around to read the author's upcoming report.

rui*** asserts that by the time members see the report, Judge Torres will have already received it.

rui*** reflects on understanding why Guo had previously called for Congressional involvement.

xin*** contends that Guo's eventual release will sound the death knell for the Alliance.

rui*** sharply dismisses a claim by user sto***, accusing them of fabricating stories.

rui*** demands proof from the speaker to substantiate the truth of what was said.