Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 029

Participant yes*** said he hoped the calls were fake but accepted, based on shared details, that they were probably real and not obviously manufactured, while permitting others to keep skepticism. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant gun*** challenged whether further doubt was even necessary, implying the calls’ credibility should be accepted. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant him*** argued for preserving money and contesting what they saw as false claims. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant him*** used a slogan-style remark ('destroy communism, comrade'), reflecting political framing within the dispute over recovery strategy. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant ntp*** questioned if the Gaoer agreement mention of the case was a carried-over term or an inserted addition. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant yes*** warned that alliance narratives seemed accepted as true while still noting clipped or uncertain full content, so reliability remained contested. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant hon*** shared an external X post in the context of discussing filing channels for third-party actions. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant ntp*** posted another X reference while the group argued about how to submit third-party motions and verify procedural notices. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant joy*** claimed the project was heavily marketed as a scam token. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant yes*** asserted that Guo said the fund earned substantial profits from HCN by selling while others held locked tokens. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant ntp*** suggested that the issue might involve participants liquidating HDO. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant rim*** asked a contributor to write carefully so others could judge whether the document supported or harmed Qige. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant chu*** asked whether the court would continue to block their filing, indicating perceived ongoing resistance to document submission. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant sar*** described a new flag-branded account as likely untrustworthy, expressing initial distrust. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant rim*** mocked those seen as pretending to be comrades while criticizing Qige, accusing them of double-standard allegations. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant fen*** argued that an earlier statement by Changdao before '315' had already exposed the situation. Community statements, not court findings.

Participant him*** claimed Guo had already acknowledged that secondary-market participants were responsible for that route. Community statements, not court findings.