Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 038

rui*** laughs and admits to not knowing the answer.

ntp*** contends that challenging the defense lawyers would at most result in establishing ineffective assistance of counsel and securing substitute representation.

ntp*** disputes the preceding assertions by characterizing them as mere deduction.

sar*** notes that forty-eight hours will have elapsed by that evening.

ntp*** explains that drafting depends on individual preference and can either be comprehensive or focused on a single targeted point.

him*** inquires whether anyone has called the court to verify if the pro se email account was compromised by hackers.

an7*** points to a court recruitment notice for Chief Counsel and Supervisory Pro Se Law Clerk as evidence of a staff shortage.

rui*** speculates that a staff clerk may have resigned after being admonished by the judge for uploading ECF 733.

zha*** argues that filing under Section 2255 carries substantial risk after an appeal fails, asking whether pro se submissions could demonstrate prosecutorial and defense liability.

hon*** asks why a prominent commentator has taken no recent action.

ntp*** observes that filing an amicus curiae brief represents acting as a friend of the court, whereas intervention involves seeking formal party status in the proceedings.

rui*** clarifies that their intention is solely to criticize Guo rather than harbor prejudice against the Chinese Communist Party.

reb*** contends that the government returning the Bugatti to Post Oak Motors refutes bankruptcy findings and justifies establishing an independent receivership to protect ordinary investors.

him*** speculates that pro se submissions are no longer being uploaded either because an active inquiry is underway or because the clerk's office is unstaffed.

reb*** argues that if prosecutors fail to respond to the asset freeze request by Sep 20, 2025, pro se litigants can seek a writ of mandamus from the appellate court after fourteen days.

rui*** asserts that their motion will directly describe the prosecution as the largest judicial fraud in United States history.

him*** recounts that another motion explicitly urged prosecutors to make the right decision while funded by American taxpayers.

rui*** contends that ECF 733 has already established fraud on the court by the prosecution.

chu*** advises pro se litigants to preserve deleted Gettr posts to submit to the court as evidence that posters are framing Guo rather than acting as co-conspirators.

ntp*** informs another participant that their Gettr account has already been taken down.

pus*** shares an external social media post from X.

rui*** claims to be among the very few who understand the underlying essence of the Wangmiao Village legal strategy in the drama Tiandao.

him*** observes that the drama Tiandao is not a comedy.

rui*** contends that the worst possible outcome of their legal maneuvering would be the total embarrassment of the American judicial system.