Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 043

zha*** urges early email complaints to the Second Circuit to apply pressure on the Southern District by leveraging judicial mechanisms.

ntp*** states that the prosecution's Brady submission was sent out and notes difficulty in finding a logical way to list all alleged alliance frauds.

rui*** asks group members with PACER access whether they noticed that no documents were filed that day.

rui*** acknowledges the response regarding the PACER docket status.

rui*** shares what they characterize as the most formidable victim motion in Chinese.

rui*** shares the English version of the victim motion.

rui*** contends that their filings will exert severe psychological pressure on opposing parties ahead of sentencing.

xin*** questions whether artificial intelligence is truly capable of producing such powerful legal work.

zha*** predicts that court authorities will not allow the filing to be made public or uploaded to the docket.

rui*** agrees that the court will certainly avoid uploading the document.

an7*** criticizes confrontational tactics as misguided grandstanding and argues against pressuring the judge or urging others to cite filing 733.

ntp*** contends that during forfeiture enforcement, the judge should be alerted that the prosecution and Luc are allegedly continuing to conspire and defraud the court.

an7*** accuses rui*** of constantly badgering members to declare themselves victims and cite filing 733 for disruptive purposes.

rui*** asserts an intention to seek the mutual disqualification and removal of both the judge and the attorneys.

an7*** argues that Geyer faithfully represents the client by citing filings 478, 612, 643-1, 676, and 717, and contends he aims to restore exchange operations or return property unlawfully forfeited by the government.

rui*** retorts by asking whose motion failed to attack Geyer.

him*** argues that defense counsel owes duties solely to the defense rather than third parties, who should retain their own lawyers.

rui*** contends that an attorney commits malpractice if they ignore third-party notices concerning fraud on the court.

ntp*** raises the question of whether the filer possesses standing and whether the judge can disregard the submission if standing is lacking.

rui*** insists that they undeniably possess the proper legal standing.

him*** maintains that while raising issues is possible, defense counsel has no connection to or obligation toward third parties.

him*** asserts that any submission requires direct personal standing, without which an individual has no right to file.