Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 055

rui*** claims the label of judicial hacking is being used because they say opponents forced them into that role. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** argues that without certain blocking behavior, participants would not have become 'hackers.' Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says the jury-related issue is secondary in importance. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** argues that in criminal cases, broad participants such as third parties, victims, court friends, and even unrelated parties can raise prosecutorial-violation claims that should be accepted and answered without delay. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says the second-review process did not give them meaningful input. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** claims that the 507 filing was not denied. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** says names such as Torres, Zhubobei, and Carolyn were rejected together in a procedural package. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says the case can be directly challenged for overturning on the basis of 765. Community statements, not court findings.

zha*** says the sharp 765 filing being uploaded is significant. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** argues courts should contact parties by email before mailing, whether submissions are proactive or reactive. Community statements, not court findings.

chu*** argues any court-targeted challenge should also include the Chongqing case participant. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says the second-review handling should be reviewed for procedural clues. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** says someone reads motions and sidesteps the people who actually write them. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** claims that a southern-district victim with a lawyer can directly file a 'cronic' action. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says participants should not expect lawyers, whom they describe negatively. Community statements, not court findings.

zha*** asks whether disclosures in the 853n email still need to be restated without CVRA framing. Community statements, not court findings.

zha*** urges direct, decisive participation through group discussion and group expansion. Community statements, not court findings.

ntp*** mocks face-masking signals and casts suspicion on the person being discussed. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** shares a broadcast link tied to Tian Dao for the group to follow. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** encourages members to watch what the speaker says in that session. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says the speaker moved to a new segment once the third-party seizure part ended. Community statements, not court findings.

sar*** says AI drafts text but does not produce a Word file, requiring manual additions and frequent de-overlapping edits. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** says legal writing needs foundational concepts before effective drafting. Community statements, not court findings.

hah*** accuses others of being trapped in AI-driven delusion. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** says many people did write letters to judges and prosecutors, while acknowledging that method may have been wrong. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** dismisses some momentum as merely waiting and asking for things. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** claims one participant is the most likely to win a retrial. Community statements, not court findings.

him*** says one needs conceptual grounding before writing legal commentary. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** advises others to avoid giving legal opinions they consider ungrounded. Community statements, not court findings.

rui*** says another person’s legal level is poor. Community statements, not court findings.

sar*** says personal information has not yet led to harassment and may not be worth much in this context, framing it as a bluff. Community statements, not court findings.

zha*** argues intensive home monitoring and real-time multi-location backups are needed for security. Community statements, not court findings.

zha*** calls for stopping the upload of third-party personal files. Community statements, not court findings.

hah*** says one participant had already blacklisted them earlier. Community statements, not court findings.