Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 077

kir*** contends that prosecutors are visibly cooling their relationship with Luc.

ntp*** asks whether the prosecution is also waiting for the defense to subpoena Luc.

ntp*** notes that Luc has not appeared publicly for an extended period.

kir*** urges participants who harbor grievances against the alliance farms to seek redress.

kir*** asserts that next week's filing targets the Ivy League Alliance while Long Island Alliance requires action from chu***.

ntp*** asks whether submitting documents could ignite another wave of alliance disclosures in the Southern District.

kir*** challenges Zhang Yongbing and the alliance to petition the Second Circuit for an injunction against Ryan.

kir*** contends that failing to take legal action marks the end for alliance fraudsters.

kir*** alleges that Ivy supported storming the courthouse.

kir*** argues that Docket 388 defines the old alliance as co-conspirators while leaving the new alliance undetermined.

kir*** describes alliances operating under the banner of the Whistleblower Movement and NFSC.

joh*** contends that after July 16, registrations and letters avoided the Himalaya Alliance name, using Geyer representing 6000 or Govenman representing Hamilton's 324 instead.

kir*** contends that the claims referenced by others actually constitute remission.

kir*** asserts that current proceedings operate under Section 853.

kir*** questions whether previous claims were filed under Section 853(n) or administrative remission.

pz0*** recounts that a court distribution order allows approximately 55% recovery of money defrauded through Wei Lihong's Voice of Guo.

pz0*** argues that this recovery percentage is acceptable by fundraising fraud restitution standards.

kir*** describes earning an annual return of 7000% while mocking community members.

beg*** describes reading the English filing and noting that Zhang Yongbing reportedly controlled and influenced witness testimony.

beg*** contends that impersonation constitutes a criminal offense in the United States and that a call from Guo Mei could halt it.

him*** argues that what one chooses to believe is an individual matter.

roy*** shares a link to a social media post published by Elon Musk.

roy*** argues that Elon Musk has openly attacked Guo.

ntp*** questions what Elon Musk intends to do with his post.

him*** contends that the targeted individual had not made any improper statements.

beg*** recounts that members previously removed from the group were consistently those who had challenged alliance leadership.

sar*** argues that members unwilling to participate should leave the group rather than criticize others' choices.

sar*** argues that opponents fear Discord and asks how the community would communicate if the platform were lost.

anl*** asks whether Telegram is secure.

ntp*** disputes the likelihood of a platform shutdown, noting that even WeChat did not take such action.

kir*** contends that both old and new alliance legal frameworks have constituted high-risk structures throughout this case.

kir*** alleges that the alliance has continuously exercised control over witnesses.

joh*** agrees with the claim regarding alliance witness control.

roy*** contends that Guo appears powerless in this case and contrasts his children's inactivity with Jimmy Lai's family in Hong Kong.

roy*** argues that Guo Mei writes weekly personal updates yet fails to publicly challenge alliance impersonation.

him*** disputes that false statements by Guo Mei would represent Guo Wengui.