Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 107

ntp*** asks whether State Security is responsible for investigations while Public Security handles actual enforcement.

ntp*** argues that airing grievances in court is prohibited and will only invite reprimands from the judge.

joh*** asks the previous speaker to elaborate further.

lui*** asks whether someone is urging all investors to step forward and file pro se actions.

lui*** asks for guidance on what course of action would be more effective.

lui*** recounts deepening involvement and contends that the Lady May yacht will definitely not be auctioned.

lui*** argues that Wang Yanping's guilty plea was a deliberate setup.

joh*** disputes the claim by asking whether supporting evidence exists in court filings, asserting pro se submissions record evidence rather than create intentional delays.

joh*** reminds others that each individual must make their own decision.

reb*** inquires about the nature of the notice filed under docket 842.

kir*** suggests that docket 842 might be another restraining order.

him*** recounts that an individual claimed to have submitted multiple motions in the Southern District that were never uploaded.

him*** argues that prosecutors do not judge whether someone supports Guo solely by whether they invoke the CVRA.

him*** contends that individuals filing motions citing the CVRA face hostility from both sides.

him*** clarifies that nonparty status means one is neither a defendant nor the prosecution.

ntp*** expresses disbelief that the reported victim count is so low.

kir*** clarifies that the figure represents five individuals rather than five percent.

spr*** argues that compensation should at least equal N+1 severance rather than merely several days of wages.

reb*** describes a claim that remitting funds to the Himalaya Exchange resulted in an empty account with no HDO received.

joh*** contends that the claimant in docket 841 from Yangfan Farm invested 6 million in 2022 after quota deadlines passed, asserting the funds remain in Hamilton.

zha*** describes separating allegations against the Alliance and farms from whether Guo himself defrauded investors.

joh*** describes telling investors to demand money back from the Himalaya Exchange.

beg*** shares an external link to a social media post.

wen*** asks how to add a handwritten signature to an email using an iPhone.

chu*** posts a message that was redacted for private personal information.

mrz*** argues that the essential question is whether the old and new Alliances truly represent Guo Wengui.

joh*** contends that document 834 refers to Qingteng as a host rather than a secretary-general because he lacks any statutory leadership position.

lui*** asks whether access to an evidence collection room is restricted and whether CVRA submissions must rely on personal records.

him*** clarifies that being a nonparty means one is neither a defendant nor the prosecution.

him*** argues that prosecutors failed to explain why filings from other nonparties were accepted onto the docket.

kir*** advises against filing anything while the restraining order remains active.

ntp*** questions the utility of complaining in the group rather than protesting at the courthouse.

zha*** asks whether participants should seize the opportunity to email the Southern District to question the issue again.

him*** describes domestic investors as having no retreat except to press forward in hopes of finding a way out.

him*** contends that the Alliance portrays the United States as corrupt to make people in China lose faith in the American legal system.

reb*** criticizes American authorities and sanctions as performative posturing comparable to empty political rhetoric.