Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 120

kir*** asks when victims are permitted to intervene in the case.

kir*** questions whether victim intervention only occurs after conviction.

him*** contends that negotiating now is favorable because sentencing is approaching.

hel*** questions why prosecutors never listen to their voice or opinions if they supposedly act on their behalf.

wen*** contends that prosecutors neither represent nor protect that individual.

kir*** argues that the individual is not an actual victim.

him*** contends that prosecutors did not communicate because hel*** never reached out to them.

hel*** asks whether submitting a second mandamus petition to the Second Circuit incurs another $600 filing fee after paying $600 initially.

kir*** advises against taking action yet, warning that Second Circuit documents have not been uploaded and procedural issues may exist.

kir*** sarcastically remarks that participating in negotiations would turn into a group brawl.

kir*** scoffs at the prospect of negotiation.

kir*** contends that the prosecution must now be traumatized.

spr*** claims that the Alliance concealed this portion of the trial transcript so that it does not appear in the record.

ntp*** suggests that the materials should be available on CourtListener.

reb*** shares an online link to court case documents hosted on NFSC Press.

chu*** asserts that their actions are driven by personal interest rather than support for Guo.

him*** asks whether chu*** would continue speaking out if prosecutors returned money to them.

him*** argues that filing under §853(n) is appropriate if the primary goal is obtaining funds.

jim*** wonders why the blogger has not updated and asks whether he was arrested.

jim*** expresses concern that the blogger has likely been detained.

spr*** observes that the person apparently has not been released.

xia*** contends that an indictment is genuinely possible.

mia*** expresses confidence in Guo's capabilities.

xia*** asks whether participants believe a sentence will actually be handed down in Guo's case.

sar*** inquires whether two mandamus petitions to the Second Circuit use separate docket numbers requiring two filing fees, referencing case 26-1178 with ECF 844 and asking about the ECF number for case 26-364.

beg*** notes that a Certificate of Service may appear on the final page of the main filing while Form 1080 goes on the first page, adding that Second Circuit filings allow email submission whereas Nathan Rehn must be served by physical mail.

spr*** asks whether sending documents as separate files in a single email is acceptable.

ntp*** argues that observers will likely label the participant as CCP-affiliated, mirroring exposure tactics used in China.

him*** sarcastically reacts to accusations of acting on assigned tasks.

reb*** angrily questions whether the fraud alliance has been co-opted by Chinese ruling authorities.

chu*** shares a social media link related to the Whistleblower Movement.

chu*** recounts that the labor agency refused to issue written notice, dismissed them from work starting tomorrow, and promised to pay owed wages the next afternoon.

chu*** requests that group members screenshot recent messages and save family contact details in case their phone is confiscated or messages are deleted.

kir*** refers participants to a docket entry in United States v. Guo on CourtListener.

kir*** notes that Brother Luosi's mandamus petition has been appealed to the Second Circuit.

ntp*** demands to know who spread rumors and questions whether any supporting evidence exists.