Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 124

kir*** suggests that a member appears to know an adjournment will take place on Wednesday.

may*** contends that if the judge grants another postponement on Jun 29, 2026, third-party pro se litigants should immediately file an emergency supplemental motion in the Second Circuit alleging nonfeasance and unlawful detention.

may*** proposes that third parties submit an emergency supplemental letter or motion to the Second Circuit within 24 hours of any postponement order.

lui*** inquires who benefits if the case is handled without political elements according to the prosecution's wishes.

may*** outlines a strategy for the defendant to move for bail based on due process grounds and lack of prosecution progress if proceedings are adjourned again on Jun 29, 2026.

get*** asks how many years the appellate process will take if a sentence is imposed.

kir*** contends that appeals will move forward very quickly.

get*** argues that if sentencing occurs, it reflects the enduring power of sinister forces.

joh*** contends that internal messaging and leadership maneuvers were originally orchestrated to take place after Apr 27, 2026, ahead of sentencing.

ntp*** questions what new disruption is being instigated by an individual referred to as the witch.

sar*** recounts omitting judicial recusal under Section 2016 from the title of their stay motion, having placed it only in the relief section.

him*** argues that the government does not challenge 853(n) stay motions because such motions have virtually no prospect of succeeding.

kir*** contends that any motion can still be filed as long as the odds are not zero.

him*** maintains that the chances of success under 853(n) are essentially zero.

kir*** disputes him***'s assessment, asserting that him*** fails to grasp the underlying procedural objective.

kir*** highlights an emergency motion to stay sentencing submitted by Zhiqiang Chen.

kir*** informs sar*** that their stay motion has not yet appeared on PACER.

kir*** suggests following up to check on the status of the filing.

kir*** points out that Exhibit 6, the most critical attachment, is missing from the submission.

spr*** asks which platform is being discussed and whether the one published by Himalaya Exchange was a phishing site.

kir*** argues that Bao Chu's DktEntry 32.1 filing provides a verifiable evidentiary matrix by attaching server logs in Exhibit 6 and comparing 6,512 HID codes against Southern District case filings.

kir*** contends that participants cannot rule out the possibility that a trap is being set for them.

kir*** observes that the document abruptly ends after Exhibit 5, with nothing included below it.

kir*** argues that the remission registrations submitted by Azhe and Qingteng must be struck down.

ntp*** contends that striking down those registrations is tantamount to confronting Gail.

joh*** alleges that Azhe and Qingteng directly deceived individuals into completing remission filings.

ntp*** states that they can barely recall the past details of those filings.

joh*** argues that if prosecutors forfeit GTV assets as fraud proceeds, diverted funds withheld by overseas farm leaders without entering GClub accounts will be drawn into the criminal case.

ntp*** inquires whether the alleged phishing site refers to the fake Himalaya Exchange website.

joh*** contends that Himalaya Exchange provided the data directly.

joh*** asserts that there was no email confirming authorization from Gail.

chu*** recounts that their Twitter account was frozen, completely barring them from publishing any posts.

spr*** asks for the specific reason chu***'s account was suspended this time.

joh*** advises drafting posts on primary accounts without sending them, then taking screenshots and publishing the images from alternate accounts.

joh*** contends that the account has been specifically targeted by Fei-Fei Li.

joh*** jokingly wonders whether Elon Musk personally intervened to enforce the ban.

kir*** asks whether a redacted contact was acquainted before Wenyue's arrival.

cin*** argues that setting common sense aside to focus on an improbable scenario makes its actual likelihood exceedingly remote.

ntp*** inquires whether Wenle was subjected to coercion.

beg*** contends that third-party pro se litigants act as a touchstone revealing true motives.

joh*** contends that witnesses were coached to follow scripts, questioning why Wenle sought remission rather than CVRA restitution.

sar*** recounts using Gemini to draft their stay motion and reports finding the tool quite useful.

sar*** describes how Gemini erroneously inserted a request for sentencing leniency for the defendant, advising peers to scrutinize AI outputs carefully.

spr*** recounts suspecting that the AI tool sometimes appears to weaken personal claims.

nev*** describes enterprise pay-as-you-go AI models as accessible without specialized hardware, contrasting them with consumer monthly subscriptions that throttle speeds upon exceeding quotas.