Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 126

One participant said the group was waiting for the Second Circuit to act next. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant said Monday seemed to leave only two hours of time. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant argued that sentencing should be avoided before it occurs. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant said an emergency order had been drafted and could be mailed by the next morning. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant contended that if sentencing proceeded on June 29, 2026 despite pending signals and motions, the defense would move immediately for an emergency appellate stay. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant asked whether to press for Second Circuit intervention now or wait for that intervention first. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant claimed earlier tandem orders were handled by three judges and renewal was processed by the same panel. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant asserted there were three groups of Second Circuit judges. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant affirmed the prior panel-structure point. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant claimed months passed without any 853 materials being docketed and no 853 hearing filing sent to the Second Circuit. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant disputed timing by asking whether a submission had only just been filed. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant questioned whether paper submission was still being required. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant asked whether 854 had even been reviewed. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant asked what document 854 actually was. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant asked who the filing referenced, saying they recognized only the person, not a number. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant argued sentencing needed a fixed baseline, including confirmed amount and victim count, instead of proceeding without those foundations. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant disputed whether all investors are victims, describing a split framing where the government treats some as victims or conspirators and the court as treating others like ordinary creditors. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant argued that whenever court-directed money is sought, that is treated as a loss. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant said the Second Circuit order was about forfeiture issues and that applications might continue if sentencing happened before final judgment. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant argued the panel had rejected one sentence in five emergency orders and urged checking that language. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant contended that anyone disagreeing with a forfeiture-only characterization should tell the Second Circuit. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant said the group was broadly aligned on the approach. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant urged key accounts to repost and asked others to join in forwarding links collectively. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant referenced the defense side in the dispute. Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant argued that despite perceived abnormalities, the court still gave third parties a chance to speak. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant challenged trust in AI-based conclusions. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant urged using a familiar AI partner to expand and refine interpretation. Community statements, not court findings.

One participant argued that understanding details still requires filings and that livestream evidence can be more useful than court papers in practice. Community statements, not court findings.