Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 126

kir*** contends that everything now hinges on the Second Circuit.

ntp*** observes that there would only be two hours available on Monday.

kir*** suggests seeking recusal before sentencing takes place.

spr*** suggests drafting an emergency writ of mandamus that night to mail the following morning.

beg*** argues that if the judge proceeds with sentencing on Jun 29, 2026, the defense will immediately file emergency motions for an administrative stay and a stay pending appeal directly with the Second Circuit.

ntp*** asks whether the community should prompt the Second Circuit to intervene or wait for it to act.

kir*** describes how an earlier batch of tandem orders and their renewals were handled by three judges.

beg*** contends that three groups of Second Circuit judges should be handling the matter.

spr*** expresses agreement with the assessment of judicial assignments.

spr*** contends that the Second Circuit should be notified about months without docketed filings and the lack of Section 853 hearings.

ntp*** inquires whether a document was just recently submitted.

ntp*** questions whether it is strictly required to wait for physical paper copies.

ntp*** asks if others have reviewed document 854.

reb*** asks what kind of document 854 is.

spr*** explains that they recognize the individual involved but cannot recall the specific filing number.

xue*** argues that sentencing lacks a sound basis without first establishing the total fraud amount and the number of victims.

reb*** contends that the government characterized investors as victims or co-conspirators, while the district court treated all investors as general creditors unless they actively cooperated and claimed injury.

him*** argues that whenever someone claims funds in court, that amount is tallied into the loss calculation.

him*** describes the Second Circuit mandamus order as stating that these are forfeiture matters that can be reapplied for if left undecided after sentencing.

him*** urges others to check a specific statement in the order denying five mandamus petitions.

him*** contends that those who dispute that these issues concern asset forfeiture can state their position to the Second Circuit.

spr*** remarks that everyone shares the same thought regarding the strategy.

may*** suggests enlisting specific prominent accounts to retweet while encouraging the community to amplify the messages.

joh*** refers to the defense.

him*** argues that while the case appears irregular, the court did provide third parties an opportunity to speak.

him*** questions another participant's faith in artificial intelligence.

reb*** recommends consulting a familiar AI assistant to help expand upon complex details.

reb*** describes relying on years of watching livestreams to understand the case, while acknowledging that verifying details requires checking official filings.