Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 129

him*** contends that defendants imprisoned for ten years can still overturn convictions if evidence is presented.

him*** argues that uncovering such evidence requires individuals from the organization to provide it.

mia*** argues that the Second Circuit focuses exclusively on procedural justice rather than trial evidence, accusing him*** of attempting an improper evidence-based strategy.

may*** argues that the defendant can exercise an absolute constitutional right to appeal within the fourteen-day deadline by engaging independent appellate counsel or filing a handwritten pro se notice from prison.

may*** questions whether Guo will seek another lawyer during the fourteen-day window.

may*** argues that external family or trusted supporters can retain a separate appellate team to submit a notice of appeal electronically via ECF within minutes.

him*** states that the official court records have not yet been released.

him*** suggests reviewing the sentencing record.

him*** contends that participants should await the release of sentencing records to examine the official court filings.

nev*** ponders whether someone was genuinely poisoned, noting that such a possibility would substantially increase case complexity.

nev*** states that this possibility cannot be ruled out.

hel*** furiously contends that vomiting blood cannot be faked and claims that MDC holds relevant video footage.

reb*** contends that third parties argue against asset forfeiture regardless of an enterprise finding, questioning whether the government proved that over six thousand purported victim accounts deposited funds.

him*** notes that while third parties could challenge false claims as Brother Screw suggested, execution remains an issue.

him*** argues that third parties are required to provide evidence.

reb*** argues that Judge Torres's reasoning in ECF 858 improperly locks in a money judgment before assessing losses, preventing third parties who prove ownership from reducing the judgment.

him*** contends that anyone with an 853(n) claim can file a motion in court to raise a challenge.

him*** contends that using the CVRA against false claims requires demonstrating that individuals encouraged by the Alliance farms are not victims.

chu*** shares an external social media post regarding ongoing disclosures.

sar*** suspects that Guo's lawyers received multiple translated pro se submissions without letting Guo read a single word.

nev*** asks whether Guo was halted by the judge while looking across the gallery for a woman in black.

nev*** describes afternoon rumors about mysterious figures in black and white attire as overly exaggerated.

hel*** recalls that past live broadcasts reported Guo's family members being arrested and his father being driven out of the house in the middle of the night.

ken*** questions the group membership affiliation of another participant.

him*** contends that pro se litigants represent themselves and should disregard outside commentary.

him*** urges participants to make independent judgments rather than following outside agitation.

hel*** shares a report stating that the Supreme Court declined on Jun 29, 2026, to hear Donald Trump's appeal regarding civil assault and defamation judgments.

get*** denounces Trump, contending that civil fines should be far higher and alleging an imminent national collapse.

joh*** contends that Guo's case depends on the midterm elections, dismissing ideas of direct intervention or a presidential pardon.