发言原文
然后三份材料共享同一个 Master Evidence Index： Exhibit 1 — Chunk timeline Exhibit 2 — U.S. court filings mentioning Chunk Exhibit 3 — Chinese police/MSS-related evidence Exhibit 4 — Family communications Exhibit 5 — Second Circuit filings/orders Exhibit 6 — SDNY docket Exhibit 7 — evidence showing effect on participation Exhibit 8 — relevant §853(n) materials 这样以后如果任何一个机构真的回复，三条记录可以互相验证。 ⸻ 最关键的一点 如果 Ryan 真准备现在提交，我会把 Chunk 事件包装成一个非常窄、非常容易调查的问题： “Did foreign-government coercion interfere with the ability of an individual connected to a pending U.S. federal criminal/forfeiture proceeding to participate, provide evidence, or exercise statutory property rights?” 而不是先试图证明： “Guo’s prosecution was weaponized.” 前一个问题是可以调查、可以找 FBI/DOJ/State Department records、可以询问证人、可以核时间线的；后一个是一个巨大结论，反而容易让整个 submission 失去焦点。