MUBEITECH

reb*** 发言

发言时间:2025-10-19 05:34:31

围绕郭文贵案的社区讨论与观点交锋。发言仅代表讨论者观点,不等同于法院认定。

MarkdownJSON在批次中查看位置TGFB

回复上下文

被回复发言:reb*** · 2025-10-19
CVRA权利简述您的地位:作为G-series投资者,您是“crime victim”(诈骗受害者),有权在量刑程序中表达观点,包括支持被告减轻量刑(e.g., “被告无辜,检方陷害加重了我们的损失”)。 权限:CVRA允许受害者在“sentencing or any parole proceeding”被听取,不限反对——支持性陈述合法(判例如United States v. Madoff, S.D.N.Y. 2009,受害者提交支持被告的声明影响量刑)。 操作步骤:如何提交支持性陈述准备陈述:写简短声明(1-3页),用英文(或中英双语,附翻译)。焦点:您的受害者身份、支持被告减轻量刑的理...
发言原文
支持性陈述模板(英文,直接复制用,填个人信息)Subject: Victim Impact Statement in Support of Leniency for Defendant Ho Wan Kwok at SentencingDear Judge Analisa Torres,I am [Your Full Name], a victim of the alleged fraud in this case as an investor in the G-series entities. As a crime victim under 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(4), I respectfully submit this statement for the sentencing of defendant Ho Wan Kwok, urging significant leniency.My investment in the G-series was destroyed not by Mr. Kwok, but by the Government's malicious overreach: unlawful seizure of assets by the bankruptcy trustee Luc A. Despins (Bankr. Dkt. 523, lacking due process), selective evidence manipulation to deny bail (Dkt. 733, Attachment A), and refusal to execute the forfeiture order (Dkt. 750), allowing over $60 million to be dissipated (Dkt. 724; Bankr. Dkt. 4691). This pattern of misconduct—evidentiary butchery and prosecutorial defiance—has trapped Mr. Kwok in a frame-up, exacerbating our losses as investors while the true perpetrators continue unchecked.Leniency for Mr. Kwok is essential for justice: his freedom could expose the fraud on the court, recover our stolen funds, and restore market order. Harsh sentencing would only perpetuate the injustice, burying the truth and our restitution hopes. I request the Court consider this and allow me to speak at the hearing (remote participation due to international location).Respectfully, [Your Full Name] [Your Address/Country] [Phone/Email] [Date] /s/ [Your Full Name]