Guo Wengui / Miles Guo — criminal case · STIPULATION · ECF #870

METADATA

Party
Guo Wengui / Miles Guo / Ho Wan Kwok
Case
United States v. Ho Wan Kwok
Court
SDNY
Case No.
23-cr-00118
ECF #
870
Type
STIPULATION
Filed
2026-08-18
CITE THIS FILING

United States v. Ho Wan Kwok · SDNY 23-cr-00118 · ECF #870 · STIPULATION · filed 2026-08-18 · English original text · Mubei Archive (墓碑档案) · https://mubeitech.com/en/court/court_sdny_870_0

Stipulation and Order — United States v. Ho Wan Kwok (Miles Guo / Guo Wengui), SDNY 1:23-cr-00118-AT ECF #870 (filed Aug 18, 2026). In a stipulation entered by the Court, the Government recognizes third-party petitioner Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP as a bona fide purchaser for value under 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)(6)(B) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(B) of approximately $3,304,285.11 in legal fees already paid by the G Club entities. In exchange, the firm releases all claims to the seized G Club International funds (approx. $11,538,579.87) and G Club Operations funds (approx. $2,112,510.70), reserving only the right to seek remission or to present a claim before a Special Master for approximately $1,142,638.81 in unpaid fees.

FULL TEXT

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
#

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

#

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

#

- v. - : S3 23 Cr. 118 (AT)

#

MILES GUO, : STIPULATION AND ORDER a/k/a “Ho Wan Kwok,” : a/k/a “Miles Kwok,” : a/k/a “Guo Wengui,” : a/k/a “Brother Seven,” : a/k/a “The Principal,” : a/k/a “Boss,” :

#

Defendant. :

#
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP,
#

Petitioner.

#

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

#

WHEREAS, on April 24, 2024, defendant Miles Guo a/k/a Ho Wan Kwok (“Guo” or

#

“Defendant”) 1 was charged in a third superseding indictment, S3 23 Cr. 118 (AT) (the

#

“Indictment”) (Dkt. No. 307), with conspiring to commit racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

#

§ 1962(d) (Count One); conspiring to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

#

§ 1939 (Count Two); conspiring to commit money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h)

#

(Count Three); conspiring to commit securities fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (Count Four);

#

wire fraud in connection with a GTV Private Placement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2

#

(Count Five); securities fraud in connection with a GTV Private Placement, in violation of 15

#

U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78ff, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and 18 U.S.C.§ 2 (Count Six); wire fraud in Also known as: Miles Kwok, Miles Guo, Wengui Guo, Guo Haoyun, Guo Wen Gui, Guo Wengui, Guo Wen-Gui, Gwo Wen Gui, Hao Yung Guo, Haoun Guo, Haoyun Guo, Ho Wankwok, Kwok Ho, Kwok Ho Wan, Wan Gue Haoyun, Wan Gui Haoyun, Wen Gui Gwo.

#

connection with a farm loan program, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Count Seven);

#

securities fraud in connection with a farm loan program, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and

#

78ff, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and 18 U.S.C.§ 2 (Count Eight); wire fraud in connection with

#

G|CLUBS, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Count Nine); securities fraud in connection

#

with G|CLUBS, in violation of 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b) and 78ff, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and 18

#

U.S.C.§ 2 (Count Ten); wire fraud in connection with the Himalaya Exchange, in violation of 18

#

U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 2 (Count Eleven); unlawful monetary transactions, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

#

§§ 1957 and 2 (Count Twelve); and obstruction of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2)

#

and 2 (Count Thirteen);

#

WHEREAS, the Indictment alleges that the racketeering enterprise operated by Guo

#

included G Club International Limited and G Club Operations LLC, among others;

#

WHEREAS, the Indictment alleges that the offenses charged in Counts One through

#

Twelve were committed beginning at least in or about 2018 through at least March 2023;

#

WHEREAS, the Indictment contained forfeiture allegations alleging that, (i) as a result of

#

committing the offenses charged in Count One of the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit (a) any

#

interest acquired or maintained in violation of Section 1962; (b) any interest in, security of, claim

#

against, or property or contractual right of any kind affording a source of influence over, any

#

enterprise the defendant and his co-conspirators established, operated, controlled, conducted, or

#

participated in the conduct of, in violation of Section 1962; and (c) any property constituting, or

#

derived from, any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, from the racketeering activity charged

#

in Count One of the Indictment, including specifically identified properties (collectively, the

#

“Racketeering Property”); (ii) as a result of committing the wire fraud and securities fraud offenses

#

alleged in Counts Two, Four, and Five through Eleven of the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit

#

any and all property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the

#

commission of said offenses, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency

#

representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of said offenses and the

#

Racketeering Property; (iii) as a result of committing the money laundering offenses alleged in

#

Counts Three and Twelve of the Indictment, the defendant shall forfeit any and all property, real

#

and personal, involved in said offenses, or any property traceable to such property, including but

#

not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of property

#

involved in said offenses and the Racketeering Property;

#

WHEREAS, the Racketeering Property includes property derived from G Club

#

International Limited and G Club Operations LLC, among others, as well as approximately

#

$11,538,579.87 in United States currency formerly on deposit in a specified account at Mercantile

#

Bank International held in the name of “G Club International Ltd.,” seized by the Government on

#

or about October 16, 2022 (the “G Club International Funds”);

#

WHEREAS, on July 16, 2024, following a jury trial, Guo was found guilty of Counts One,

#

Two, Three, Four, Seven, Eight, Nine, Ten, and Eleven (Dkt. No. 395);

#

WHEREAS, on or about May 3, 2024, Guo’s co-defendant Yvette “Yanping” Wang

#

pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to a two-count Superseding Information S2 23 Cr.

#

118 (AT), charging Wang with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money

#

laundering, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 371 and on January 7, 2025, the District Court entered a final

#

order of forfeiture (the “Wang Final Forfeiture Order”) (Dkt. No. 488) vesting all right, title, and

#

interest in the property specified therein, including the G Club International Funds, in the United

#

States;

#

WHEREAS, on or about August 11, 2025, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of

#

Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment (the “Guo Preliminary Forfeiture Order”)

#

(Dkt. No. 720), imposing a money judgment against the Guo in the amount of $1.3 billion,

#

representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One, Two, Four,

#

and Seven through Eleven of the Indictment that the defendant personally obtained and property

#

involved in the offense charged in Count Three of the Indictment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

#

§§ 981(a)(1)(C), 982(a)(1), and 1963; 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 21 U.S.C. § 853(g); and Rules

#

32.2(b)(3) and 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; and further ordered the

#

forfeiture to the United States of specifically identified properties (the “Forfeiture Specific

#

Property”), including the G Club International Funds;

#

WHEREAS, on or about January 19, 2026, the Government filed an application for a First

#

Supplemental Preliminary Order of Forfeiture (Dkt. No. 790) ordering the forfeiture of

#

approximately $2,112,510.70 formerly on deposit in an account held at Banco Popular in the name

#

of G Club Operations LLC (the “G Club Operations Funds”);

#

WHEREAS, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(c) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(c), title in forfeitable

#

property vests in the United States at the time of the commission of the offenses giving rise to the

#

forfeiture, subject to any assertion of an innocent-owner or bona-fide-purchaser for value claim or

#

defenses pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)(6) or 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6);

#

WHEREAS, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP ( “Pillsbury”) has asserted an interest

#

in certain proceeds derived from G Club International Ltd. and G Club Operations LLC, namely,

#

approximately $3,304,285.11 paid by or on behalf of G Club Operations and G Club International

#

to Pillsbury as payment for legal services provided by Pillsbury prior to September 1, 2023 (the

#

“Paid Legal Fees”) and (ii) the G Club Operations Funds up to and including the amount of

#

approximately $1,142,638.81, representing the amount of fees owed by G Club Operations and G

#

Club International for legal services provided by Pillsbury between September 1, 2023 and May

#

17, 2024 (the “Unpaid Legal Fees”);

#

WHEREAS, with the consent of the Government, Pillsbury’s time to file a petition

#

asserting an interest in the Paid Legal Fees or the Unpaid Legal Fees has been extended up to and

#

including the date of this Stipulation and Order;

#

WHEREAS, Pillsbury has provided a Declaration to the Government setting forth the

#

factual and legal basis for its interest in the Paid Legal Fees and Unpaid Legal Fees, including

#

Pillsbury’s status as a bona fide purchaser for value who at the time was reasonably without cause

#

to believe that the Paid Legal Fees were subject to forfeiture;

#

WHEREAS, the Government and Pillsbury have agreed to resolve their respective interests

#

in the Paid Legal Fees, the Unpaid Legal Fees, the G Club International Funds, and the G Club

#

Operations Funds on the terms set forth below.

#

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the

#

United States of America, by its attorney Sean S. Buckley, Attorney for the United States Acting

#

Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515, Assistant United States Attorney, Juliana Murray,

#

of counsel, and Pillsbury, by its counsel, Sharon Cohen Levin, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP that:

#

1. The G Club International Funds, the G Club Operations Funds, and the Paid Legal

#

Fees are subject to forfeiture as a result of the defendant’s and Wang’s commission of the offenses

#

for which the defendant was found guilty and to which Wang pleaded guilty, and are subject to

#

forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 1963(a) and (c), 981(a)(1)(C), and 982(a)(1); 28 U.S.C.

#

§ 2461(c); and 21 U.S.C. § 853(c).

#

2. Based on the sworn information in the Declaration and other information known to

#

the Government, the Government recognizes Pillsbury as a bona fide purchaser for value of the

#

Paid Legal Fees pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963(l)(6)(B) and 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6)(B).

#

3. Pillsbury agrees that it will not assert, nor assist any others in asserting, any claim

#

for the G Club International Funds or the G Club Operations Funds, including the Unpaid Legal

#

Fees, nor any claim against the United States of America (“USA”), the United States Marshals

#

Service (“USMS”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the

#

Southern District of New York (“USAO SDNY”), and their officers, agents and employees, in

#

connection with or arising out of the seizure, restraint, and/or constructive possession of the G

#

Club International Funds or the G Club Operations Funds, including, but not limited to, any claim

#

that there was no probable cause to seize and/or forfeit the G Club International Funds or the G

#

Club Operations Funds, that Pillsbury is a prevailing party, or that Pillsbury is entitled to attorney’s

#

fees or any award of interest.

#

4. Pillsbury reserves the right to file a Petition for Remission or a claim before a

#

Special Master in an amount not to exceed the Unpaid Legal Fees.

#

5. Pillsbury agrees to hold harmless the United States, USMS, FBI, SDNY-USAO,

#

and any and all employees, officers, and agents of said entities from any and all third-party claims

#

of ownership of the Paid Legal Fees.

#

6. This Stipulation and Order may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be

#

deemed an original, and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed the complete

#

Stipulation and Order. Signature pages may be by fax, signed digitally, or transmitted

#

electronically, and such signatures shall be deemed to be valid originals.

#

7. This Stipulation and Order constitutes the complete agreement between the Parties

#

as to the Funds and may not be amended except by written consent thereof.

#

8. The Parties hereby waive all rights to appeal or to otherwise challenge or contest

#

the validity of this Stipulation and Order.

#

9. Each Party agrees to bear its costs and attorneys’ fees.

#

10. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to take additional action and

#

enter further orders as necessary to implement and enforce this Stipulation and Order.

#

AGREED AND STIPULATED TO:

#
SEAN S. BUCKLEY Attorney for the United States
#

Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515

#

By: 7/29/2026

#

Juliana Murray DATE

#
Assistant United States Attorney
#
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
#

By: 7/29/2026 Sharon Cohen Levin DATE

#
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, NY 10004 Tel: (212) 558-4334 Email: levinsc@sullcrom.com
#

Attorney for Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

#

SO ORDERED:

#

HONORABLE ANALISA TORRES DATE

#
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SUBSCRIBE

New filings added to this archive go out in the weekly brief.

No email-open or email-link tracking. One-click unsubscribe. or use RSS · details

Related in this archive