Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 018

him*** asks whether trustee Luc's creditor list includes non-G-series claimants such as Lan Yang.

him*** contends that the trustee will therefore not agree to invalidate every claimant.

him*** argues that the trustee likely will not agree to void all G-series claimants either.

him*** suggests waiting to see if prosecutors use creditor registrations this week to establish Guo's relationship with the G-series.

him*** contends that prosecutors will rely on other witness testimony and evidence rather than creditor filings alone.

him*** argues that prosecutors or Luc could assert that followers registered as creditors because Guo acted as the G-series spokesperson and personally guaranteed against losses, making their claims legally reasonable.

pz0*** contends that under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 sentencing must precede third-party property disputes, predicting the prosecution's forfeiture motion will mirror Yanping Wang's forfeiture order in criminal docket 488.

ntp*** observes that the matter has already dragged on for a year and further delays would make little difference.

pz0*** states that Luc's legal fees are paid out of Guo's recovered assets pursuant to paragraph h on page 4 of bankruptcy docket 2094.

rui*** states that the funds currently belong to Guo.

rui*** contends that resolving third-party disputes is generally required before sentencing, though exceptions exist.

rui*** argues that severe consequences will follow if the judge imposes sentencing while disregarding third parties.

rui*** shares the assessment that an appeal remains the course of action.

rui*** describes the upcoming process as a protracted battle.

rui*** contends that going all-in is out of the question.

hon*** contends that farm loans are scattered globally among internet figures, noting only US farm loans can be frozen domestically while overseas claimants must sue local leaders.

sar*** argues that the presumption of innocence applies only to legal matters, asserting interpersonal dealings require initial skepticism.

ntp*** questions this view, disputing whether the funds were ultimately supposed to be transferred to headquarters.

him*** contends that Luc can deny any responsibility for Guo's arrest.

him*** points out that prosecutors never asserted that creditors caused Guo's arrest.

him*** argues that Luc could claim he had no idea creditors would have such destructive impact.

gun*** notes that ongoing disputes surround Guo's alleged phone calls.

gun*** contends that the Metropolitan Detention Center enforces strict communication rules that bar contact with co-conspirators and RICO participants.

hon*** rejects the controversy entirely, disputing the legitimacy of the calls and asserting that all of them are fake.