Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 027

sar*** contends that they can only remain an outsider rather than a third party, comparing their courtroom standing to Bannon's.

sar*** clarifies that they did not purchase Momo coins.

sar*** recounts that living overseas for many years and relying on personal capability makes their survival manageable.

duo*** laments that HCoin missed major profit opportunities during the recent cryptocurrency boom due to Brother Seven's legal trouble.

zha*** disputes this, arguing that those who would have profited most were infiltrators and detractors whose coins were unlocked.

ntp*** expresses regret that all these opportunities were completely missed.

sar*** questions whether they are merely an onlooker rather than a stakeholder, noting that holding HID might confer stakeholder status.

sar*** considers themselves unsuitable to write letters to the prosecution.

hon*** asserts that the matter is not related to VOG.

zha*** urges waiting for knowledgeable participants before distributing documents, cautioning that missteps could harm Brother Seven's case.

zha*** agrees that knowledgeable peers should determine how investors ought to draft and submit their filings.

201*** outlines three filing avenues—contacting lead prosecutors, going through defense counsel, or filing cautiously with the court—and favors contacting prosecutors first.

xin*** asks whether the attorneys have responded to the group.

reb*** contends that those who fail to assert rights under Section 853 risk having assets distributed to illegitimate creditors, leaving them with protracted litigation.

rui*** suggests jointly submitting Brady material when the time comes.

ntp*** notes a confidentiality notice in Document 260-1 containing prosecutors' email addresses and questions whether sending emails could cause problems.

rui*** remarks that prosecutors cannot know whether the group guessed the email addresses or acquired them otherwise.

hon*** criticizes past administrations, arguing that adverse selection prevented capable individuals from succeeding.

rui*** calls for the group to undertake an immediate action.

rui*** insists that the group must serve Brady material to the prosecution.

rui*** affirms the proposed course of action.

rui*** points out that creditors cannot overturn the case because the thousands of alleged victims at the initial arrest originated from the earlier GTV private placement.

rui*** expresses frustration regarding the underlying circumstances of the case.

rui*** suggests approaching the legal situation from a different angle.

hon*** contemplates how to address the judge to seek recovery of funds from Xia Qidong and challenge the disbursement of money without proper investigation.

hon*** denounces the individual's claims of fleeing Germany for safety reasons as deceptive.

rui*** advises bringing a direct legal action as a third party.

reb*** states their intention to handle the matter according to their proposed plan.

ntp*** responds with a question mark seeking clarification.

rui*** suggests that reb*** proceed first with the Section 853 filing to gauge the judge's reaction.

reb*** argues that intentional prosecutorial misconduct undermining core evidence can destroy the prosecution's credibility and warrant case dismissal or acquittal.

rui*** observes that the judge is unaware of the group's Brady-related exchanges with the prosecution.

rui*** inquires about the relationship between two conspiracy documents and the creditors.