Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 027

A participant argues they are only a bystander or third party and says their court role is equivalent to another member’s, indicating limited standing, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims they did not buy Momo coin, distancing themselves from that investment narrative, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says they have long overseas experience and self-described competence, so they contend survival is not currently a major issue, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues that without the incident, Xibi would have been overwhelmingly profitable during the crypto period, Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant contends that if profits occurred, they likely went mainly to unlocked pseudo accounts and informants, not the locked participants, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims the market opportunities were perfectly missed, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks whether they are only a spectator and therefore not a stakeholder, raising a status dispute, Community statements, not court findings.

The same participant claims they are unsuitable to write directly to the prosecution, suggesting limits on participation, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant gives a terse denial—“not VOG”—while rejecting an unstated label, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues that trusted members should first assess how to draft and send documents, warning that careless filing could harm the case, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks for guidance on how investors should frame and write their filing approach, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant proposes submitting first and evaluating later, and lists three routes—prosecutor, defense counsel, and cautious court filing—with a preference for direct prosecutor contact, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks whether counsel has responded, signaling concern about procedural engagement, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues inactive victims risk losing assets to creditors and says only those who assert rights may preserve part of the pool, with others diverted by registered claims, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says they will proceed with a collective Brady step together, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant highlights a 260-1 prosecutor email containing strict confidentiality language and asks whether contacting those addresses is legally risky, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims uncertainty about whether the recipient knows the group is making only speculative allegations, Community statements, not court findings.

Another participant adds political commentary comparing eras and claiming a survival-of-the-fittest dynamic, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says the group now needs to take one concrete action, Community statements, not court findings.

Another says the next step is to submit Brady-related material to prosecutors, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant confirms agreement with that course, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues that where creditors cannot overturn the case, thousands initially tied to the arrest may have been earlier private-placement GTV participants, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims the situation is tainted and expresses strong disgust, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says the issue should be examined from a different angle, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks how to address the judge, claims a document already identifies the target as a fraudster, and argues for recovery and accountability for those who provided funds, while condemning prior judicial handling, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant disparages the defendant’s narrative as false and repetitive, asserting he claimed Germany was unsafe before relocating, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant suggests proceeding via third-party self-complaint, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says they are preparing a specific handling approach, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant issues a brief uncertainty marker, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims the path is to proceed with Section 853 first and observe the judge’s response, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues that deliberate violations on key evidence can undermine prosecutorial credibility and should lead courts to reject other unverified evidence, potentially supporting dismissal or acquittal logic, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant notes the judge may not know that Brady matters were already discussed with prosecutors, Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks how two alleged conspiracy documents are related to creditors, disputing the connection, Community statements, not court findings.