Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 079

reb*** contends that document 134 in the adversary proceeding relates to an injunction cited by Luc Despins, arguing that the court barred the debtor from disproving Gongzu's claim while the trustee refuses to verify it.

reb*** argues that the bankruptcy court failed to hold hearings on debtor objections by deferring to the trustee, which Luc allegedly leveraged to initiate the criminal indictment.

reb*** questions why claims promoted by the defendant are accepted as real while Gongzu's is treated as fabricated, noting Luc accused the defendant of defamation for alleging multiplied claims.

him*** questions whether there is documentary evidence for Gongzu's claim amount as a G-series investor and asks how much she actually invested.

him*** asks why Gongzu's claim is treated as genuine while other creditors' claims are considered false.

kir*** notes that Gongzu registered a claim of over 200,000 without multiplying it by thousands, whereas Julia's registered claim appeared exaggerated.

him*** asserts that orders from the criminal court take precedence over those from the bankruptcy court.

him*** argues that criminal and bankruptcy proceedings conflict with each other and asserts that Judge Manning never ruled that Guo's encouragement violated an injunction.

reb*** contends that the 320 billion figure must include Gongzu and others, adding that the bankruptcy court approved Luc's application to anonymize creditors.

him*** asks whether Luc had already investigated and stated that there were 320 billion in false claims.

him*** questions how Luc investigated and arrived at the 320 billion figure.

him*** asks whether that total includes funds claimed by Gongzu and Julia.

xin*** expresses confusion over whether individuals qualify as victims, do not qualify, or are unwilling to be designated as victims.

xin*** shares a draft template for a motion to enforce rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771, challenging the prosecution's disclosure and claim determinations.

kir*** remarks that the demands outlined in the drafted motion appear very vague.

xin*** comments on the immense scope of judicial power.

sar*** describes judicial lifetime tenure and contends that Judge Torres showed overt bias in Guo's case.

joh*** alleges that the judge is compromised, arguing that the sale of Mahwah property constitutes an unavoidable issue for her.

ntp*** asks kir*** whether the screenshot of the tweet warning him is still available.

ntp*** shares an external link to a post on platform X.

xin*** requests a link to the community's court document repository.

roy*** describes providing personal investment details and chat group content to an AI to generate drafting materials without needing to understand legal intricacies.

kir*** warns that copying and pasting content will be caught by the judge.

ntp*** recounts frustration that Gemini erroneously denied that document 803 mentioned GTV until shown page numbers and screenshots.

him*** notes that the prosecution has not yet responded to document 799.

him*** questions what is intended by repeated references to attorneys.

reb*** contends that prosecutors and Luc unfairly attribute G-series entities to the defendant while simultaneously denying the defense standing to challenge forfeiture orders.

him*** notes that the prosecution currently relies on the fact that the jury has already returned a conviction.

him*** states that the prosecution argues Guo exercised substantive control over the G-series entities.

kir*** contends that there is no proof establishing such control.

joh*** alleges a RICO conspiracy aimed at collecting third-party investor information to mislead investors into claiming victim status.

joh*** asserts that a RICO conspiracy involved falsely registering bankruptcy creditors and presenting coordinated perjured testimony at trial.

wei*** contends that the prosecution against Guo Wengui is the result of Chinese Communist Party political framing and transnational repression.

kir*** contends that drafting the criminal filing in such a manner makes formal docketing impossible.

reb*** remarks that attempting an appeal directly to the Supreme Court could be a viable move.

sar*** outlines the structure of the federal court system, explaining the appellate role of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit over district court decisions.