Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 101

kir*** contends that judicial fraud exists and will prevent the prosecution from confiscating any funds.

kir*** agrees that the judicial proceedings are fundamentally compromised.

beg*** contends that judicial supervisors cannot resolve procedural unfairness, incomplete case files, or the judge's refusal to docket third-party submissions.

joh*** argues that the situation reflects the same principle as the 6,000 creditors tied to Gail.

joh*** contends that the objective is substantiating the authentic existence of creditors rather than deleting them.

joh*** recalls that docket 733 noted Guo was denied bail due to fraudulent creditor registrations.

ntp*** asks whether someone assisted in deleting creditors from the list.

joh*** affirms that assistance was provided to delete creditors.

him*** questions whether the creditors who were not deleted had been instigated by Guo.

joh*** contends that the prosecution would otherwise obtain nothing from the proceedings.

kir*** argues that there were prior indications showing the prosecution betrayed Luc.

kir*** argues that the prosecution will refuse to shoulder any blame.

reb*** describes a second certiorari rejection by the Supreme Court requiring circuit court review first, concluding that pre-judgment legal avenues in the Southern District are exhausted.

sar*** recounts learning another member filed for certiorari rather than mandamus and expects their own submission to be rejected on similar grounds.

kir*** contends that the entire bench of Second Circuit judges will mobilize for Guo's main appeal.

ntp*** observes that the defense participated in an awkward joint livestream with an outside faction.

sar*** describes submitting eight electronic pro se complaints and one paper complaint to the Southern District since late September of the previous year without any being uploaded to the docket.

spr*** recounts not having drafted any filing yet due to uncertainty about how to write it.

mia*** contends that the case will conclude if Guo chooses not to appeal following sentencing.

him*** argues that participants appealing to the Second Circuit must submit letters to both the district and circuit courts prior to sentencing to preserve their claims against mootness.

him*** contends that opposing parties are waiting for motion filers to abandon appeals so the filings lapse.

him*** questions whether a CVRA motion becomes void after sentencing if the filer fails to seek mandamus in the Second Circuit beforehand.

him*** contends that rights under Section 853(n) and the CVRA persist after sentencing if claimants actively pursue them.

him*** argues that while an 853(n) denial can be appealed, winning an appeal in this case is improbable.

joh*** contends that alter ego arguments constitute the core foundation of the prosecution's criminal indictment.

joh*** argues that legal actions target corporate entities as Guo's alter egos to confiscate assets.

reb*** questions whether defendants were unaware of docket 817 and whether case file copies were served on defense counsel.

sar*** remarks that another participant appears to be proposing strategy for defense attorneys.

him*** contends that it remains uncertain whether defense counsel represents Guo directly or serves the Alliance.

him*** contends that internal actors intend to sacrifice Guo to safeguard themselves.

xin*** asserts that one only needs to state the details clearly to an artificial intelligence tool.

xin*** describes possessing proof of their TDCCP coin purchases.

xin*** disputes how the prosecution can establish that Guo issued the cryptocurrency without proof.

joh*** argues that an online commentator is displaying guilt by evading questions concerning Percy while reposting other content.

joh*** asserts that the 6,000 creditors tied to Gail reflect the identical dynamic.

sar*** contends this demonstrates that the Qing faction controls the TDCCP cryptocurrency.