Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 112

kir*** asks whether Luosi Ge can proceed after sentencing.

him*** contends that sentencing does not mean previously filed motions simply disappear.

him*** argues that once sentencing occurs, procedural questions become effectively settled and unchangeable.

spr*** quotes language indicating that DX's application to file supplemental documents supporting a mandamus petition was granted and considered.

spr*** notes that Zhengqing reposted ECF 849.

mrz*** observes that although only a few thousand people invested, most investors still support Guo despite misleading actions by alliance farms.

chu*** argues that victims in normal criminal cases need not intervene independently, but claims investor victims in this case distrust the prosecution and avoid its victim registration.

him*** contends that it makes no sense for victims to approach the defense team and that defense counsel should not accept them.

him*** argues that third parties filed their own motions precisely because they lacked confidence in the prosecution.

kir*** refers to the five individuals involved in the Second Circuit stay.

chu*** maintains that genuine victims definitely exist, though their numbers remain very small.

kir*** remarks that the five individuals in the Second Circuit did not oppose the Chinese Communist Party and questions how they became the only five supporters recognized by the prosecution.

lui*** contends that the Department of Justice is infiltrated and that prosecutors fabricated victims alongside alliance figures rather than identifying genuine victims.

lui*** argues that individuals pursuing anti-communist goals view themselves as victims of government misjudgment rather than victims of Guo.

lui*** asserts that prosecutors distinguish clearly between cooperating conspirators and outsiders.

ton*** argues that the CIPA ruling erred if sealed or substituted classified materials actually comprise core Brady, Giglio, and impeachment evidence.

reb*** suggests that unuploaded pro se filings likely contain significant Brady, Giglio, and impeachment materials.

joh*** contends that uploading all submissions would reveal sufficient material to justify CIPA proceedings.

.an*** recounts purchasing H-Coin at ten cents through farms, disputes fraud classifications by pointing to substantial returns, and claims participants are victims of the prosecution rather than Guo.

joh*** suggests participants could instead be considered victims of William Je or other co-conspirators.

mia*** argues that claiming investment status cannot overturn the jury verdict because project insiders testified regarding fraudulent intent.

him*** questions why only Guo was arrested if the prosecution is pursuing a RICO conspiracy.

him*** asks whether that reasoning implies that the six thousand members associated with GTV will inevitably succeed.

joh*** suggests urging prosecutors to identify specific scapegoats among alleged co-conspirators.

mil*** predicts that Guo will be sentenced and immediately deported to China in July rather than serving time in the United States.

kir*** expresses skepticism toward claims of imminent sentencing and deportation.

kir*** remarks that Luc is finished.

chu*** contends that unverified statements by Guo that lack cross-examination in court should be dismissed entirely.

mia*** argues that establishing co-conspirators as intelligence agents is required to sever Guo from the RICO allegations and questions whether anyone has the evidence to prove it.

202*** reports having been removed from a group.

202*** posts a redacted member identity reference.

202*** describes an acquaintance who is a veterinarian handling major business who is also present in the legacy chat group.

him*** contends that licensed lawyers are barred from representing themselves pro se.

kir*** argues that licensed attorneys should be permitted to do so.

him*** maintains that the prohibition applies regardless of what license the attorney holds.