Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 158

beg*** asks whether Guo made another phone call to Jiajia following the launch of Getter coin.

kir*** contends that Guo has been placing various phone calls.

beg*** questions whether anyone can guarantee that prosecution attorneys will not dismiss charges or face staffing cuts.

sar*** contends that insiders are selling each other out to survive and using private messages beyond the reach of subordinates.

joh*** asserts that personal safety and staying alive are paramount.

joh*** alleges to cin*** that may*** was the person who betrayed and sold cin***'s information.

kir*** argues that after reassessing the case, Guo might not have any legal counsel in the Second Circuit.

kir*** contends that private claimants will pursue their legal actions all the way to the final conclusion.

kir*** argues that while CVRA provisions preclude retrial requests and could defeat standing to vacate sentencing, the court must still confront factual assertions regarding Rule 32.

kir*** contends that even if the Second Circuit denies standing to vacate, it will still have to address the factual record presented.

may*** criticizes the contradictory logic of continuing to support Guo after being defrauded by him.

may*** contends that the Alliance could never have defrauded victims of their money without Guo.

joh*** argues that Qingteng risks criminal exposure by pressuring Changdao without possessing a non-prosecution agreement regarding withheld funds.

joh*** contends that Qingteng issued Getter coin to launder previous funds and maintain the loyalty of core operators rather than merely soliciting money.

hel*** recounts feeling foolish and defeated, describing a painful personal recovery after realizing that Guo cannot even save himself.

joh*** points out online attacks launched by An Xiaodong from the Spanish farm against Qingteng and the Shanghai farm faction.