Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 165

joh*** estimates that only $10 million of VOG funds was effectively frozen after transfers and a $46 million check.

joh*** contends that investors awaiting refunds through VOG or Sara could pursue Wei.

joh*** argues that $46 million remained on VOG's books for civil refunds after a $64 million transfer, but refunds were delayed.

beg*** questions whether a reported $89 million transfer accounted for all farm loan funds.

beg*** asks for the source of the $117 million figure.

beg*** asks why farm loan funds were not seized if prosecutors considered the enterprise a criminal organization.

joh*** alleges withheld Maywind loan funds and contends that $4 million entrusted by other investors was excluded from refunds.

joh*** disputes Long Island's eligibility to represent farm loan investors and alleges inadequate disclosure.

joh*** describes him***'s view that private claimants can pursue distribution under 853(n) but cannot challenge funds prosecutors did not seize.

kir*** asks whether the $889 million includes Mahwah and a settlement with Luc exceeding $100 million.

kir*** says the property is included in forfeiture but is unsure whether it is included in the money judgment.

reb*** argues that the $889 million judgment differs from assets actually controlled by the government and disputes the treatment of third-party interests under 858.

joh*** questions the authenticity of victim statements in Wang's case and alleges misuse of investor details.

sar*** predicts that the Second Circuit will hear private claimants but ultimately reject their claims.

joh*** asks whether GTV Fair Fund refunds should be deducted from the $1.4 billion involved.

beg*** contends that ruling 858 cites inapplicable cases.

joh*** argues that more than 200 petitions must be docketed if the judge rules under 853(n).

kir*** argues that Rule 32 must be followed regardless of procedural order.

sar*** describes an attachment criticizing Judge Torres for alleged unfairness.

kir*** contends that the Second Circuit mentioned a participant to support overturning the case.

kir*** asks how many people filed motions to vacate and how many sought dismissal.

roy*** describes 2026 ONSC 2943 and 2026 ONSC 5735, case 420/26 ML, as rejecting special disclosure and leave to appeal without deciding the underlying claims.

roy*** argues that available evidence supports continued operation by GETTR USA, Inc. and does not establish a transfer to a new company.

roy*** cites ECF 716-4 as evidence that Hamilton held 95% of GETTR while cautioning that it does not establish ultimate control.

reb*** alleges that earlier GETTR coin data was deleted and funds were transferred again.

joh*** asks whether Hamilton's ownership explains GETTR's continued operation despite some funds being taken.

joh*** alleges that G Fashion changed its name after receiving loan funds and questions its absence from charges and the forfeiture list.

sar*** asks whether a statement admitted that investor information was given to the Chinese government.

kir*** says there was no direct admission but recounts an allegation attributed to a state security officer.

beg*** alleges widespread disclosure of investor information and suggests arguing its materiality under 858.

kir*** alleges that alliance farms interfered with judicial proceedings.

beg*** describes 858 as saying the government can decide which assets to forfeit.

ntp*** speculates that people are waiting for the midterm elections.