MUBEITECH

chu*** 发言

发言时间:2025-11-03 04:18:24

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论,包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇,并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节,为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据,引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

MarkdownJSON在批次中查看位置↗TG↗FB
发言原文
Dear court staff, I sent this motion to the court on April 14, but up to now, the court documents have not uploaded my motion. I guess it is very likely that it has not passed the court's review. I am just an ordinary person, I don't understand the law, and I don't have a lawyer. And in China, no one dares to consult a lawyer about this case because the Chinese Communist Party is involved behind it. I accept the court's reasonable review of my motion! However, I also want to express my doubts! I finally chose to be a victim, and I quoted the Crime Victims' Rights Act. What I want to say is that Geyer also quoted the Crime Victims' Rights Act. In the legal sense, the thousands of Himalaya Exchange customers represented by Geyer are also victims! However, Geyer said many times in court that these thousands of Himalaya Exchange customers are not victims of Guo Wengui, but victims of the Ministry of Justice. I really can't understand this behavior! What Geyer said and what he did are completely