发言原文
Guo encouraged his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court in the order of the first rejection of Guo's application for bail in Document 51, and the judge determined that it was obstruction of justice. When Guo Wengui applied for bail for the second time, the prosecution repeated that Guo's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court was an illegal act of obstruction of justice. Torres once again confirmed that Guo's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court was obstruction of justice. After the first bail was rejected by Judge Torres, Guo appealed. My understanding is that the appellate court supported the prosecution and Judge Torres and dismissed Guo's appeal! This means that in court, Guo Wengui's behavior of encouraging his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court was determined by the court at least twice to be obstruction of justice! If the dismissal order of the appellate court is also counted, it means that Guo Wengui was found to have obstructed justice three times!