MUBEITECH

chu*** 发言

发言时间:2025-11-03 04:13:41

这里汇集爆料革命参与者围绕郭文贵案的持续讨论,包括长期深度参与者及自述投入真金白银的投资者。他们分享亲历过程、资金投入与后续遭遇,并结合案卷展开追问、核对和观点交锋。这些来自事件内部的经验与细节,为理解事件经过和投资者处境提供了外部报道之外的重要视角。请结合具体发言判断其经历与依据,引用时保留发言者、时间和上下文。

MarkdownJSON在批次中查看位置↗TG↗FB
发言原文
The prosecutors amended the indictment, introduced RICO, and removed the most easily established charge of conspiracy to obstruct justice. Why? Was the prosecutor merciful or guilty? These are all my guesses. I will not bear any legal responsibility. You can figure it out for yourself! Why did the prosecution's indictment give up the most easily established crime, obstruction of justice? The first version of the indictment, the twelfth charge against Guo Wengui, obstruction of justice! In Document 7, the prosecution's motion for pre-trial detention of Guo Wengui, regarding the obstruction of justice, Guo's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court is a very core accusation of obstruction of justice. When Guo Wengui applied for bail for the first time, one of the reasons for the prosecution's opposition was that Guo Wengui obstructed justice, among which Guo Wengui's encouragement of his followers to register creditors in the bankruptcy court was accused by the prosecution of obstruction of justice. Judge Torres also quoted the prosecution's statement that