Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 030

A participant says the government has begun seizing funds in the Guo Wen Gui case and urges anyone who thinks money belongs to them to file quickly or risk forfeiture; they share the notice link as the path to act. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says the posted link is primarily to collect money and argues that challenges to false claims must be filed pro se. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claims many transfer accounts are missing from the published account list, so some payments can only be delivered by mail. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says both of two initial options are unavailable and suggests a third route of filing by email to court. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant defers the decision, saying the choice is up to the filer. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant ties the issue to the alliance farm and claims questions about missing investment funds coincide with investors being removed from records. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks whether a private-format template is the correct filing form. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant frames the objective simply as getting money and says they had not researched other legal angles. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says a specific motion—labeled by name/number as clarification—is clear and shares it as guidance. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks a fluent-English member to call the court, verify why documents were not uploaded, and ask when third parties may intervene after the forfeiture notice period. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argues that denying docketing of a Section 853(n) petition for content reasons could implicate due process, citing U.S. v. Fafalios and recommending evidence retention plus pro se intake and complaints to court administrators. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says this is the court’s pro se intake contact number. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant describes the court’s ECF 528/596 framework as narrowing non-party submissions and says submissions by Chunk Chyi/Bei Bei Zhu across ECF 505, 507, 508, 510, 513, 517, 519, 522, 524, 553–557, and 582 were often out of scope, threatening, or abusive. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks which order number directs the judge’s review of clerk filings. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant responds that the controlling order number is 528. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says these facts are already understood by investors and become clear through deeper investigation and field checks. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asks whether prosecutors opposed one person but not another, signaling doubt about consistency in prosecution positions. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant questions why certain people were not removed from a farm context and probes leadership accountability. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant accuses others of staging the case and deceiving peers into filing as victims, claiming this harmed allies. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant rejects the accusation as irrelevant and says they were not scammed out of 60,000. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant responds with further derogatory attacks against the critic as a chronic liar. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant directly challenges another member by asking whether they are anti-Guo. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant says they care about the final stage and the meaning of the last five percent. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant urges ordinary community members to produce reasoned evidence against the group, reclaim followers, and prevent the idea that the alliance and Guo are inseparable. Community statements, not court findings.