Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 030

goh*** contends that the government is seizing assets and urges participants claiming ownership to petition promptly before forfeiture concludes.

him*** argues that the forfeiture link is solely for claiming funds and contends that challenging false claims requires filing pro se.

rod*** describes that many participants wired funds to accounts omitted from the notice, arguing that those claims can only be sent by mail.

zha*** asks whether they should reject both options and instead email the court to appear.

ntp*** tells zha*** to make the decision independently.

zha*** contends that this approach connects the alliance farms to the investments, questioning missing funds and the expulsion of investors.

rod*** asks another participant to verify whether the template sent in private chat matches the required motion format.

ntp*** notes that the other participant's objective is obtaining money, stating they have not researched that issue.

him*** contends that motion ECF 522 clearly explains the relevant points.

chu*** requests that members with strong English call the court to ask why their filing was not docketed and when third parties may intervene before the sixty-day deadline expires.

reb*** argues that blocking Section 853(n) petitions touches due process, citing U.S. v. Fafalios and suggesting steps such as preserving records and submitting strategic motions.

him*** provides the telephone number for the court's pro se department.

pz0*** quotes from orders ECF 528 and ECF 596 regarding improper non-party filings and judicial pre-screening requirements.

ntp*** asks which court order instructed the clerk to screen submissions.

him*** identifies the screening order as ECF 528.

zha*** asserts that these circumstances are widely understood among investors and would become obvious upon thorough inquiry.

rui*** asks whether prosecutors objected to Gal while not opposing Luc.

ntp*** asks which farm was involved and expresses surprise that the member was not expelled.

rim*** accuses rui*** of manufacturing the case, tricking fellow members into registering as victims, and fearing pro se submissions.

rui*** recounts not losing 600,000 to the alleged scammer regardless of assigned tasks.

rim*** attacks rui*** as deceitful and insults members who align with them.

zci*** asks another participant whether they oppose Guo.

zci*** expresses curiosity regarding how the final five percent will experience the conclusion of the movement.

zci*** argues that ordinary individuals should expose the alliance to persuade adherents who still believe the alliance and Guo share common goals.