Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 040

zha*** asks whether the thirty-day deadline is approaching, proposing to submit the 853(n) petition first while revising the CVRA version.

rui*** contends that all subsequent filings will be intercepted and calls for deploying stronger measures.

goh*** advises retaining mailing receipts, CM/ECF confirmations, and email receipts, recommending emailing chambers with a copy to the DOJ and filing a letter motion if documents are not docketed.

him*** suggests discussing the matter with automated tools, contending that group members are non-professionals who represent only themselves.

zha*** asks if the 853(n) petition can be simplified to claim ownership of the money and assert that authorities cannot take it.

hon*** contends that participants failed to learn lessons from earlier cases or the disappearance of three hundred petitions in Yanping Wang's matter.

rui*** argues that the priority should be addressing what to do if filings are blocked rather than focusing on drafting 853 petitions.

chu*** notes that the email addresses in question belong to the prosecution.

him*** asks why automated receipts for pro se emails have stopped and advises retaining email proof or postal receipts.

ntp*** describes how automated email replies have ceased after previously arriving instantly.

an7*** argues that claiming victim status under the CVRA is exactly what the prosecution wants to see.

an7*** advises that those pursuing claims should reference Geyer's Document 478 to designate themselves as financial victims of government or trustee seizures rather than fraud victims of the defendant.

an7*** argues that Document 478 shows Geyer faithfully represented clients by opposing government forfeiture and framing exchange customers as financial victims of asset seizures.

rui*** contends that Geyer represents co-conspirators and declares a need to draw a clear line against them.

chu*** notes that Document 392 is relatively important.

him*** contends that choosing whether to act as a victim is each individual's own decision without needing external coaxing.

pz0*** contends that group members are behaving like habitual petitioners.

pz0*** criticizes members for being unable to comprehend English filings or use the PACER system.

rui*** contends that everyone in the group has failed to grasp the main point.

rui*** recalls that an associate previously submitted a motion written in an extremely aggressive tone.