Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 048

chu*** describes being entirely broke after losing all money, suggesting that having nothing left might prevent others from harassing family members.

chu*** suggests repeatedly proclaiming that Guo committed fraud.

sar*** recounts lacking a Himalaya Coin account or early investments and contends that pursuing pro se action is the right path, intending to target the Alliance and defense lawyers first in upcoming motions.

zha*** asks whether participants sent their emails invoking Section 853(n) or the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).

ntp*** describes submitting their filing under Section 853.

zha*** notes that only a few days remain and asks whether another submission under the CVRA is necessary.

boo*** relays a notice advising Himalaya Exchange customers to submit forfeiture remission petitions via the official government forfeiture website by Oct 22, 2025, while an ancillary petition is prepared for Oct 21, 2025.

mia*** questions why the announcement fails to mention the participant's motion.

chu*** asks whether the posted announcement was drafted by the participant.

reb*** asks how many third parties have appeared in the Second Circuit appeal for this case and whether additional third-party appeals can be located.

zha*** comments on the release of Santos following a sentence commutation by Trump, arguing that Santos was a political prisoner.

zha*** asks whether ancillary hearing proceedings have commenced, recounting that participants have not received hearing notifications.

sar*** recounts having just dispatched a third pro se filing.

him*** asks whether return receipts are now being issued for pro se email submissions.

ntp*** recounts receiving a confirmation receipt for a submission sent on the 9th.

reb*** contends that Rule 33 allows an order of acquittal or a new trial due to irreparable prosecutorial misconduct, citing case precedents and Dkt. 733 to argue sentencing could be bypassed.

sar*** remarks on the extensive length of the posted legal explanation.

reb*** explains that the argument reflects the drafting style of Grok and suggests reading the concluding points.

reb*** contends that the published notice relates to ancillary proceedings whereas victims should now intervene directly in the sentencing phase.

reb*** outlines procedures for submitting victim impact statements advocating leniency in Case No. 1:23-cr-00118-AT, arguing that the court is statutorily required under 18 U.S.C. § 3771 to consider them.

reb*** provides a draft victim impact statement requesting sentencing leniency for Ho Wan Kwok, citing Bankr. Dkt. 523, Dkt. 733, Dkt. 750, Dkt. 724, and Bankr. Dkt. 4691 to allege government overreach and asset dissipation.

dom*** contends that Bankruptcy Docket 2083 and Criminal Docket 204 substantiate a significant and subjective overlap between bankruptcy creditors and criminal fraud victims in the Mahwah property settlement.

rui*** enthusiastically observes that another member located documentation directly addressing the unresolved question of creditor and victim overlap.

mia*** disputes attempting to overturn a conviction through the U.S. legal system while simultaneously professing contempt for American justice.

wen*** recounts that early 2023 creditor registrations involving 1,600 claimants and 32 billion in claims provided trustee Luc Despins with grounds to trace G-series assets.

wei*** notes that the observation serves as a helpful prompt to investigate those creditor registration records.

wei*** recounts that their social media comment on X concerning a joint bankruptcy hearing was submitted to the court under Docket 739, praising the filer.

hah*** shares an attachment with no accompanying text.

wen*** contends that attorney Geyer emailed Himalaya Exchange users directly rather than through Nick's recommendation, suggesting that internal Alliance personnel shifts created information gaps.

hah*** posts an attachment without accompanying text.