Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 104

joh*** contends that an individual was misled by the organization and that her presentencing plea letter to the judge appeared to convey despair.

him*** states that Zhu Beibei also alleged that Guo's signature on a letter supporting Diddy was fraudulent.

him*** contends that this individual represents a judicial counterpart to Azhe.

kir*** contends that the conventional victim-defendant legal model no longer fits and questions why a victim can launch broad verbal attacks beyond the defendant.

ntp*** clarifies that the speaker was referring to the Southern District of New York email address for pro se submissions.

chu*** shares a pro se emergency motion submitted on Apr 15, 2026, by Ryan Bai requesting the Second Circuit to stay sentencing scheduled for Apr 27, 2026, in 1:23-cr-00118-AT pending mandamus petition No. 25-2726, Dkts. 38 and 39.

kir*** observes that another participant appeared to submit filings pro se via email.

ntp*** recounts that their case was docketed first before receiving a follow-up phone call.

spr*** describes omitting a Certificate of Service and mailing receipts to the prosecution and defense, asking whether paper copies must be served on both parties.

reb*** questions whether the Second Circuit has violated 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(3) by putting CVRA mandamus rulings on indefinite hold beyond the seventy-two-hour requirement.

kir*** begins a brief interjection regarding the statutory timeframe.

joh*** argues that Wang pleaded guilty to fewer counts related to GTV without objecting to prosecutors defining the forfeiture scope to cover almost the entire G enterprise.

kir*** expresses agreement with the ongoing evaluation of procedural developments.

joh*** contends that group members were urged to submit remission forms without opposing forfeiture or raising 21 U.S.C. § 853(n) petitions so assets could transfer to bankruptcy creditors.

joh*** disputes the legitimacy of a creditor in the bankruptcy case, alleging that the individual acted as a conspirator receiving Rule of Law Foundation remittances.

joh*** contends that Guo was definitely not the party who registered the contested claim.

him*** contends that Guo's suggestion regarding registration was conditional and not a mandatory instruction.

joh*** alleges that an online user maintains alternate accounts in the group to steer public opinion using leaked screenshots.

kir*** notes that another complicating factor is that nobody knows what Brother Luosi is doing.

joh*** argues that prosecutors, the trustee, and the judge operated within a contrived framework to make the proceedings appear legally justified.

him*** contends that substantive arguments are futile and that only procedural defects, ineffective assistance of counsel, and judicial bias remain viable issues.

kir*** contends that the Second Circuit retains judicial discretion in these matters.

kir*** states an intention to have a summary prepared by next Friday.

roy*** urges experienced group members to promptly submit comprehensive details and procedural flaws to the Second Circuit directly or through parties with pending appeals.

reb*** shares evidentiary discovery arguments and reminds participants that they have a two-month window to incorporate them into their legal submissions.

beg*** argues that Judge Torres would conclude that regardless of dispute over 1.3 billion versus 550 million, the jury's guilty verdict warrants a ten-year sentence.

ntp*** asks whether the newly granted postponement indicates that the emergency motion proved effective.