Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 118

kir*** contends that participants can pursue a stay before the Second Circuit.

him*** argues that the contents of a motion are only evaluated by the district court after it has been properly uploaded.

him*** observes that the district court has not even uploaded the filings.

him*** contends that litigants must prove that the failure to docket the motion substantially impacts the case.

him*** argues that filers must demonstrate that docketing filings only after sentencing would cause irreversible harm.

him*** notes that the Second Circuit's order characterized these issues as forfeiture matters that could be docketed after sentencing.

him*** states that the Second Circuit indicated the movants raised matters concerning forfeiture.

reb*** details legal arguments under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 and 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), contending that entering final money judgments before resolving third-party property claims creates irreversible harm under Pepper v. United States and Nken v. Holder.

reb*** argues that prosecutors selectively portrayed fund transfers among entities to suggest investor money went to family members, when fund tracing might show the money came from family funds.

joh*** asserts that the family received old money originating from a family trust.

beg*** asks about the relationship between Lady May 1, Lady May 2, and the 2.3 million dollar maintenance fee.

beg*** contends that witness testimony constitutes evidence, noting the prosecution's reliance on Li Ya's testimony.

him*** suggests that proceeding under the Crime Victims' Rights Act affords greater procedural flexibility.

kir*** recounts a statement attributed to Anna that prosecutors consider only those opposing the government to be genuine supporters rather than victims.

spr*** shares an excerpt describing a law firm's commercial representations of Chinese state-owned enterprises and entities.

spr*** shares a link to an external social media post as the source for the material.

beg*** praises the referenced post for being well written and among the first to address forfeiture issues regarding Wang Yanping.

kir*** highlights the order referenced as 853.

chu*** references document 851.

kir*** advises that those filing under Section 853(n) as supporters should cite that document, asserting that challenging the prosecution establishes supporter status.

joh*** suggests directly challenging the validity of the forfeiture, arguing it originated in Wang's case while asset commingling issues involving Tony remain unresolved.

reb*** recalls that Tony raised the matter during the stay application and wonders what burden of proof the Second Circuit requires to order pre-sentencing resolution by the district court.

him*** contends that ruling the yacht belongs to Guo would be unfavorable to Guo.

ntp*** questions whether the prosecution deceived both the judge and the jury.

ntp*** argues that even if motions are dismissed, the primary goal is sustaining pressure on the Southern District rather than compelling docketing.

ntp*** contends that Judge Torres must bear the burden alone because no alternative scapegoat is available.

ntp*** remarks that third parties have effectively taken on the role of defense counsel.

ntp*** advises uploading documents immediately regardless of how the court responds.

ntp*** agrees that filing documents serves to prepare legal material for appeal.