Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 119

roy*** contends that the current offense is trivial and compares it to subverting state power.

roy*** argues that picking quarrels and provoking trouble is too insignificant of a charge to matter.

spr*** asks whether the court indictments and documents posted online are all publicly accessible.

kir*** states uncertainty regarding whether the materials are accessible to the public.

roy*** reports hearing that the two charges involve investments and articles published on Gettr.

joh*** points out that the documents omit the process of farm leaders receiving and transferring funds.

joh*** observes that the documents only mention specific farm and Iron Blood leaders, including Zhang, Xia, Wang Xuebing, David from the UK, Sara Wei, and Li Ya.

him*** contends that only Guo and Wang have been arrested in the case so far.

joh*** agrees with reb*** that prosecutors declined to indict certain individuals because they served as tainted witnesses.

him*** contends that the prosecution would not sign an agreement otherwise.

him*** disputes the existence of any non-prosecution agreements, calling them rumors fabricated by Ivy League.

joh*** questions whether Qing would sue prosecutors over screenshots provided to Qing in ECF 833.

him*** contends that the prosecution no longer retains any credibility.

him*** asserts that the case has already collapsed.

him*** states that it remains unclear why the proceedings continue to drag on.

him*** argues that the case collapsed the moment Brother Luosi appeared in court.

kir*** asserts that chunk chyi is not a victim.

sar*** describes intervening in the Second Circuit as a victim and wonders whether that qualifies as verified victim status.

sar*** asks whether the initial mandamus petition has concluded, whether adding motions to the Second Circuit is easy, and if filing a new petition requires paying another $600.

kir*** highlights the Second Circuit.

ton*** recounts that six out-of-court statements by Wang Yanping were admitted for their truth as co-conspirator statements under FRE 801(d)(2)(E), citing Doc 388 §I.

ton*** notes that on May 28, 2024, the court ruled the government could ask questions eliciting statements from Wang, citing Doc 382 line 49 and Tr. 436:2–437:22.

ton*** describes prosecutors arguing in court for days that Wang served as an assistant who performed the acts and confessed.

him*** contends that the prosecution can argue individuals no longer own their money once it was transferred to the G-series.

him*** argues that legal standing under the CVRA is stronger.

ton*** argues that Section 853(n) is intended for asset recovery, though group members also use it to seek the truth.

hel*** asks for contact information or an email address for the newly appointed Attorney General's office.

kir*** contends that the Chinese government could appeal regarding the funds invested by Brother Luosi.

hel*** asks whether the June 29 proceeding will be postponed again and on what grounds Judge Torres might grant a continuance.

joh*** cynically remarks that the reason for a delay could be as trivial as a pet dog dying.

reb*** asks whether the three docket entries beginning with 850, previously labeled notice other on CourtListener and PACER, have been reclassified as mandamus petitions.