Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 159

_ki*** asks whether another member would invest in Guo.

_ki*** questions whether Guo would ever invest in Ryan.

_ki*** remarks that Guo was once the richest person in Henan.

sar*** recounts spending over three weeks drafting a seven-chapter, 39-page record document concluding with Luosige's arrest, inviting others to verify it using artificial intelligence.

sar*** contends that the courtroom is the true battleground and challenges anyone who disagrees to make their case before the court.

sar*** describes Supplemental Exhibit D-1 filed on Sep 9, 2026, in the Second Circuit under Dkt No. 26-1476, explaining that the 39-page submission aims to document factional social media manipulation, assembly-line pro se filings, and the cross-border detention of grassroots pro se litigant Luosige.

xia*** asks about the current whereabouts of Luosige.

ntp*** states that Luosige remains in detention.

_ki*** argues that only Guo invested in his own ventures while prominent insiders like Qmay's son did not invest.

kir*** asks him*** to interpret Jason's motion seeking to vacate all orders, witnesses, testimony, and proceedings allegedly influenced by foreign forces.

may*** contends that whether authorities conduct an investigation is entirely up to them.

kir*** challenges him*** over a previous assertion that third parties cannot pursue final judgment.

may*** asserts that Ryan has prevailed.

joh*** argues that if Xiaoyang confronts the lawsuit rather than backing down, he establishes himself as the rightful leader of the protesters and the New Federal State of China, sidelining the Ivy League alliance.

kir*** expresses agreement with the reasoning regarding Xiaoyang's strategic positioning.

spr*** remarks that there is still a substantial amount of work to be done.

may*** declares that victory has been achieved and investments recovered.

may*** remarks that individuals have attained fame and wealth.

kir*** argues that seizing control of the chat group is pointless given that the forfeiture proceedings have already collapsed.

kir*** contends that Jason has reached final adjudication, directly challenging him***'s claim that third parties cannot pursue final judgment.

joh*** disputes him***'s skepticism and notes that other participants and their legal advisors surely understand the situation.

kir*** asks whether more than one hundred million dollars claimed by Luc Despins inside the forfeiture pool creates a Rule 32 sentencing loss conflict if settled under bankruptcy law.

reb*** contends that the argument holds if total inflows excluding GTV were only 858 million dollars and 170 million dollars was distributed to Trustee Luc Despins.

joh*** argues that Khaled returned misappropriated funds after being caught yet coordinated with the prosecution narrative alleging GClub membership fees were not used for operations.

joh*** contends that the Ivy League alliance operates as a compromised tool willing to fabricate claims even if its members ultimately face imprisonment like Wang Yanping.

joh*** argues that grassroots campaign workers do not even know who Yu Jianming is.

reb*** contends that Yu Jianming's faction withdrew at least hundreds of millions of dollars through Himalaya Exchange cash-outs.

kir*** argues that attributing the same funds simultaneously to the bankruptcy estate, criminal forfeiture, and USSG §2B1.1 sentencing loss creates factual contradictions that courts must resolve under Rule 32(i)(3)(B).

kir*** argues that while Trustee Luc Despins's settlement reveals overlap between bankruptcy assets and criminal forfeiture, appealing the sentence requires proving that disputed funds directly tainted the sentencing loss calculation without resolution under Rule 32(i)(3)(B).

reb*** contends that GClub membership fees constituted legitimate operating revenue rather than fiduciary investment funds, arguing expenditures on housing and vehicles were lawful as long as infrastructure development proceeded.