Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 162

joh*** infers that farm and alliance funds paid for everything except a satellite phone.

joh*** contends that money MOS sent Wei was recovered into a Long Island company account and excluded from the $1.4 billion.

joh*** questions why a remaining 30% was excluded when the preceding 70% was counted in the $1.4 billion.

joh*** argues that an appeal concerning Maywind recoveries could challenge forfeiture and questions why investors were not repaid.

beg*** recalls lending to Maywind, an account seizure, Arizona litigation and partial repayment, and says settlement material was preserved on appeal.

joh*** argues that Maywind farm loans were omitted from the preliminary forfeiture list and that investors can pursue CVRA claims.

kir*** asks whether Maywind funds absent from the criminal charges were included in the money judgment.

joh*** says Maywind does not appear on the preliminary forfeiture list.

reb*** argues that all farm loans were included in the money judgment and forfeiture, despite their absence from the list.

roy*** says records show MOS received $8.1363 million, while individual possession and investor distributions need further evidence.

roy*** describes an unproven allegation in 22-50073, Dkt.5230, referencing CV2024-008429, Filing ID 21604891, that some Maywind investors were excluded from a distribution.

beg*** asks what authority the person nicknamed Nine Fingers had to settle civil claims if the loans were subject to forfeiture.

tia*** asks about GTV refunds and recounts hearing that the second round was paused and the third under review.

kir*** speculates that Zhang Yongbing may have withdrawn all the money.

joh*** contends that someone who authorized Zhang but received no refund can pursue a claim and describes him as an uncharged co-conspirator.

joh*** argues that Helen's Maywind farm-loan investment supports a CVRA challenge and should be distinguished from other funds.

joh*** contends that the evidence already before the Second Circuit is sufficient to renew the claim.

joh*** argues that final forfeiture will be difficult until the approximately $8.13 million is resolved.

ntp*** questions whether someone who filed no motion in the Southern District can appeal to the Second Circuit.

beg*** describes ordinary appeal as a potential alternative to mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 and § 1291.

spr*** argues that new evidence must undergo adversarial testing and cannot simply be treated as part of the trial record.

beg*** asks when Hahn claimed the Chinese Communist Party made her sign a non-prosecution agreement.

kir*** asks whether the $889 million judgment includes funds associated with a supposed agreement but absent from the indictment.

beg*** asks what agreement uncharged co-conspirators had with prosecutors and whether investor money was used to buy cooperation.

beg*** asks whether adopting prosecutors' forfeiture figures implied an untested alter-ego finding.

roy*** describes Adv. P. 24-05276, Dkt.37, as a motion to compel and distinguishes the trustee's recovery allegations from established findings.

kir*** speculates that Luosi Ge was killed and blames may*** and him***.

kir*** accuses may*** of responsibility for a death.

kir*** accuses him*** of killing Luosi Ge and asks why the allegation cannot be made public.

kir*** calls a claim another version of the real-versus-fake Guo story.

kir*** describes the claim that the Guo in court is fake and the one on screen is real.

joh*** contends that different groups answer to different leaders and circulate inconsistent information.

sar*** says they hope to turn the material into court documents once they understand it.

reb*** argues that the loss calculation is unreliable and should be redone using funds tracing.

sar*** suggests considering what to do next.