MUBEITECH

Himalaya Exchange: a guide to the court record

中文

related entity · 932 matching court filings

Himalaya Exchange is the platform name associated with H Dollar (HDO) and H Coin (HCN) in the Guo Wengui / Miles Guo court record. The third superseding indictment sets out allegations about its operation, promotion and funds. Guo’s criminal judgment lists Count Eleven as wire fraud involving the exchange. This guide distinguishes parties’ claims, court decisions and hearing records.

Guide checked against the English record:

Key documents and reading order

  1. Charges · Federal grand jury

    Third superseding indictment: the exchange and Count Eleven

    Start with the allegations about the platform, HDO/HCN and the people involved, then compare later orders and the judgment. Statements here are charges.

    Locate: Paragraphs 15 and 19; Count Eleven, paragraphs 52–53

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #307 · Read document →

  2. Third-party request · Counsel for the customers

    Customers’ motion for return of seized property

    Read how the applicants describe their interest in the funds and request relief under Rule 41(g). The motion itself does not establish that relief was granted.

    Locate: Opening Motion for Return of Property

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #186 · Read document →

  3. Trustee’s complaint · Chapter 11 trustee Luc A. Despins

    Trustee’s complaint: the Himalaya entities

    See why related entities appear in the bankruptcy record. This section states the trustee’s allegations about corporate relationships and funds, not findings by the court.

    Locate: Paragraphs 116–120, Himalaya Exchange Entities

    CTB · 22-50073 · ECF #2898 · Read document →

  4. Government request · U.S. Attorney’s Office, SDNY

    Government request for a preliminary forfeiture order

    Identify the money judgment and specific-property forfeiture sought by the Government. Compare the preliminary order in #720 and the objections ruling in #858.

    Locate: Opening letter; Discussion II.A–B

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #716 · Read document →

  5. Court order · Judge Analisa Torres

    Preliminary forfeiture order: property and third-party procedure

    Read the August 11, 2025 order’s forfeiture terms and third-party claim procedure. For the subsequent treatment of the money judgment, see #858 and #860.

    Locate: Order paragraphs 1–7; signature at the end

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #720 · Read document →

  6. Defense submission · Counsel for Miles Guo

    Defense objections to the preliminary forfeiture order

    Pair this with #716 to understand objections about the amount, scope of funds and offsets. Read #858 for the court’s treatment of those arguments.

    Locate: Letter dated February 3, 2026; Introduction and Summary of Argument

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #799 · Read document →

  7. Court ruling · Judge Analisa Torres

    Forfeiture ruling: the scope of the $889 million amount

    The court sustains some objections and overrules others. Its money-judgment discussion covers the Farm Loan Program, G Clubs and Himalaya Exchange; the total is not solely an exchange figure.

    Locate: Background A; Discussion I. Money Judgment

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #858 · Read document →

  8. Criminal judgment · U.S. District Court, SDNY

    Criminal judgment: counts, imprisonment and forfeiture

    Check Guo’s written judgment. Count Eleven concerns wire fraud involving Himalaya Exchange; the overall 30-year sentence is not the sentence for that count alone.

    Locate: Page 2, Count Eleven; page 3, imprisonment; final page, forfeiture

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #860 · Read document →

  9. Hearing transcript · Court reporter

    June 29, 2026 sentencing-hearing record

    Read the context of counsel’s submissions and the judge’s remarks, keeping track of each speaker. The hearing and filing dates differ; sealed pages are absent from the public version.

    Locate: Cover and public transcript; pages 3–30 are marked sealed

    SDNY · 1:23-cr-00118 · ECF #864 · Read document →

Questions answered from the record

How do HDO and HCN relate to Himalaya Exchange?

Paragraph 19 of the third superseding indictment identifies HDO (H Dollar) and HCN (H Coin) as the two assets promoted through the platform and describes the platform’s claims about them. This identifies names and allegations in the filing; it does not verify reserves or value.

Does the judgment address Himalaya Exchange?

Yes. Page 2 of judgment #860 lists Count Eleven as wire fraud involving Himalaya Exchange. Use the judgment to check convictions and #307 to read the charges; not every charge in an indictment resulted in a conviction.

Is the entire $889 million amount attributed to the exchange?

No. The money-judgment analysis in #858 addresses cash inflows to the Farm Loan Program, G Clubs and Himalaya Exchange together; #860 refers to that ruling. This case-wide amount is not an amount for one platform or customer, nor a calculation of anyone’s recovery.

Does filing a return-of-property motion mean it was granted?

No. #186 records a request by customers through counsel. #720 is a preliminary forfeiture order issued by the court and includes a third-party claim procedure. Check who made each request, what the court decided and which property is at issue.

Why are criminal and bankruptcy filings listed together?

Both proceedings contain material about the exchange or related companies, but their case numbers, parties and requested relief differ. CTB #2898, paragraphs 116–120, states the trustee’s allegations; SDNY #858 is a ruling in the criminal case. Shared names do not make claims or outcomes interchangeable.

All matching court filings

Matched by entity names in the archive. Inclusion in this list does not establish a court finding about that entity.

  22. SDNY · 23-cr-00118 · ECF #712

    Response