Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 021

pz0*** reports that sentencing has been postponed to Jan 20 of next year.

chu*** shares court docket entry 719 dated Jul 31, 2025, resetting deadlines and hearing schedules.

wen*** describes the court order as welcome news, stating that the judge postponed sentencing to Jan 20, 2026, extending beyond the defense's request despite prosecution opposition.

him*** shares the prosecution's letter to Judge Torres arguing that defense counsel has had sufficient time to prepare and that victims are entitled to timely justice.

him*** recounts the prosecution's arguments regarding the voluminous trial record, Rule 16 discovery, and previous rulings under CIPA.

ntp*** inquires about the nature and context of the shared court filing.

him*** questions why the prosecution has not directly challenged trustee Despin.

him*** asks why prosecutors did not refute Despin's assertions regarding the GENIUS Act and cryptocurrency assets.

him*** contends that Brother Luosi's motion is distinct and anticipates the judge will dismiss it personally.

him*** asks whether Voice of Guo investors can appear in court following the acquittal of the entity.

ntp*** contends that Voice of Guo investors also held Himalaya Coins.

him*** observes that Voice of Guo funds do not appear to be included in the forfeiture schedule.

zci*** maintains that the surrogacy evidence originates from two authentic screenshots in Document 311 rather than fabrication.

gun*** argues that procedural injustice can still be challenged regardless of whether family spending was tied to those funds.

chu*** contends that discussing issues unrelated to the criminal case is a waste of time.

gun*** asks whether having a larger number of third-party litigants is currently advantageous.

him*** observes that social media users are circulating Brother Luosi's filing regarding Section 505 intervention.

him*** contends that the statutory provision cited in the Section 505 intervention document is incorrect.

rui*** questions why the prosecution chose not to challenge or pursue the matter in court.

rui*** asks whether prosecutors omitted intimate relationship evidence because they were already completely confident of securing a conviction.

rui*** observes that prosecutors were ultimately unwilling to bring up the subject.

rui*** suggests they may understand why Guo encouraged supporters to register as bankruptcy creditors.

chu*** argues that creditor registrations should be interpreted as false claims intended to obstruct justice.

zci*** disputes whether the Alliance would ever acknowledge fraudulent conduct or claims of diversion to family members.

joy*** urges members to post hundreds of daily messages targeting lawmakers and media claiming Luc Despin framed Guo.

ntp*** claims that someone is setting a trap for Brother Luosi.

ntp*** contends that an online commentator is merely seeking attention and acting in concert with the prosecution.

rui*** recounts having just placed a phone call directly to the Southern District of New York court.

hon*** asks whether the document or matter belongs to the speaker or to someone else.

zci*** describes internal skepticism within the group regarding members' genuine intentions and background loyalties.