Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 046

rui*** contends that taking such action is completely useless.

goh*** disputes this skepticism by questioning why the Alliance would fear anything if the actions were truly useless.

goh*** argues that observing the opposition's reactions proves that these measures are highly crucial.

sar*** describes consulting an AI chatbot that advised against printing out the entire fifty-page pro se filing along with its attachments.

ntp*** recalls that a prior letter-writing campaign prompted Judge Torres to state in court filings that she felt harassed.

rui*** shares an external link to a social media post discussing the matter.

ntp*** asks wen*** if anyone from the veteran member group wants to participate.

ntp*** inquires whether physical paper motions must be signed by hand or if digital signatures on PDFs are acceptable.

reb*** explains that any printed motion must bear a handwritten signature.

reb*** details the procedural distinction between misconduct complaints under 28 U.S.C. §§ 351–364 and writs of mandamus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, citing In re Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, 858 F.2d 331 (D.C. Cir. 1988) to explain how collective complaints create systemic pressure.

reb*** contends that dozens of complaints sent simultaneously to the Second Circuit and the Southern District of New York would exert meaningful pressure at nominal postal expense.

wen*** contends that prosecutors based their victim figures on 1,600 creditors claiming 32 billion dollars, noting Trustee Luc reported this registration to prosecutors in Docket No. 1191.

wen*** argues that the acquittal of G-TV invalidates creditor claims based on GTV investments and provides key grounds to overturn the victim count.

wen*** argues that alleged offenses like farm loan programs were committed by others, framing the arrest as procedural false arrest.

ntp*** claims that veteran investors are motivated only by financial recovery and take investment losses in stride, unlike grassroots participants who have spiritual goals.

him*** disputes this claim by arguing that veteran investors would make far more money if the case were overturned.

him*** speculates that some investors may simply want the sentencing finished quickly so the group can disband.

rod*** states that filings share the court's address but must specify Courtroom 15 addressed directly to Judge Torres.

rod*** explains that the Clerk's Office, Pro Se intake, and the judge share the same physical address with different room numbers.

him*** questions how senders can confirm receipt or processing if the court no longer uploads pro se filings.

him*** recounts being told by the criminal intake division that pro se filings are no longer docketed due to privacy concerns.

him*** describes consulting an AI bot which stated that unuploaded motions leave no official docket record for appellate review.

him*** asks whether anyone asked court personnel how unuploaded mailed documents would eventually be addressed.

reb*** argues that court docketing delays provide legal grounds to seek an equitable tolling extension under § 853(n) for an additional thirty days.

chu*** contends that requesting a one-month extension for third-party petitions is entirely reasonable given court-related processing delays.

ntp*** questions whether the applicable deadline is sixty days rather than thirty days.

wei*** contends that complaints to the New York Attorney General regarding Rule of Law entities cited in Docket No. 716 and undisclosed Brady material represent a key breakthrough.

wei*** asserts that they entered the discussion specifically to inform the group of this opportunity.

wei*** argues that evidence of political dealings involving Donald Trump in the case records provides the critical basis for overturning the verdict.

wei*** asserts that one million dollars used by Steve Bannon was provided by Yping Wang and likely disbursed by the Rule of Law Foundation.

hah*** sends a message that contains no text.

hah*** posts an additional message without textual content.

ntp*** recounts finding it strange that someone was summoned back on a prior occasion.

rui*** describes being inspired by another participant to adopt a Rule 21 motion strategy to assert Guo's innocence.

rui*** argues that although the Rule 21 approach might seem unreasonable, it is actually brilliant.