Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 047

One participant argued that seeking in forma pauperis status could allow broader participation. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claimed a joint pro se mandamus petition is permissible if petitioners share the same case and relief request, using Second Circuit and FRAP guidance, and listed practical filing conditions. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant noted the Second Circuit had returned a mandamus petition. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant explained a two-stage 853(n) structure, arguing petitions should be filed after preliminary order and notice but before final forfeiture filing, or later only on narrow procedural-error grounds. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argued an objection to a final forfeiture must be filed before the 60-day cycle closes. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant claimed the ancillary window is short, warning that once government moves to close preliminary forfeiture and finalizes it, further petitions may be treated as improper harassment. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argued the bankruptcy filings were fake from the start, claiming chapter choice made a creditor registry inconsistent and alleging tampering by actors tied to the farm alliance. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant insulted another participant as foolish while reacting to the authenticity argument. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant accused another of feigning confusion and prioritizing leverage over justice, suggesting the person wanted authority shifts rather than fair process. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant contended Luc was not a third party and cited orders 528 and motions 724/750/751 to question his right to intervene while asserting 853(n) investors retained limited hearing rights. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant said attention should be on Luc, who seemed to stay hidden while third-party petitions and sentencing phases progressed. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant challenged another’s demeanor, asking whether they had read document 733 and implying emotional instability. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant warned that joint filing could later be reframed as conspiracy. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant advised evaluating case-by-case whether solo filing or joint filing is preferable. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant stated appeals need not be joint, but motions can document that many people face the same issue and seek court attention. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asked what to do after filing pro se materials and whether related papers must be sent to prosecutors. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argued that requiring upload may be easier for the court to deny under local filing rules, while requiring written explanation is harder to reject, and proposed paper filing first then mandamus enforcement. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant suggested engaging a lawyer solely to handle filing could be a practical option. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant argued a cited TV interpretation did not show wealth redistribution, describing it instead as mutual benefit dynamics. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant asked whether mandamus access is available only through CVRA claims. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant framed the group identity as both protagonist-aligned and as community insiders in the analogy. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant said they had contacted investors to withdraw participation and argued G-series activity was investment, not political loyalty, while stressing personal safety and fairness. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant said appeals need not be joint, but motions can note repeated shared harms by many parties. Community statements, not court findings.

A participant said they would wait to compile and formally report farm-alliance fraud actors before pushing coordinated legal action. Community statements, not court findings.