Guo Wengui / Miles Guo (Ho Wan Kwok): community discussion 071

kir*** states that according to Ryan, no formal case docketing has taken place yet.

beg*** suggests that Guo's defense attorney likely has access to the materials as well.

kir*** contends that without formal docketing, the defense attorneys' risk model cannot be broken.

ntp*** questions how the prosecution indicted and arrested defendants without prior judicial victim determinations.

chu*** explains that indictments are determined by a grand jury through non-public proceedings.

ntp*** argues that the prosecution's citation of the CVRA remains an established fact.

him*** observes that whether Section 853(n) movants qualify as victims remains vaguely articulated.

him*** contends that in principle Section 853(n) claimants should not be categorized as victims.

ntp*** argues that victim status requires judicial designation and that Section 853(i) can only be applied after forfeiture concludes.

kir*** contends that submissions asserting CVRA or Section 853(n) rights are judicial claims that cannot be downgraded to administrative remission or miscellaneous complaints.

kir*** argues that judicially relabeling CVRA filings to block review constitutes a structural violation for the Second Circuit to evaluate.

reb*** contends that filing for administrative remission under Section 853(i) or asserting CVRA rights does not legally waive independent property ownership claims under Section 853(n).

him*** recounts that the judge referred to remission applicants as victims in the transcript while strictly refusing to extend that designation to Section 853(n) property claimants.

him*** asserts that individuals seeking remission are indeed classified as victims.

kir*** contends that Section 853(i) and Section 853(n) procedures operate mutually exclusively.

beg*** suggests submitting this major filing directly to the Southern District judge as a petition or motion.

him*** recounts the government's motion for a preliminary forfeiture order under Dkt. 720 ¶ bb targeting Banco Popular funds and Barclays Bank accounts in the Isle of Man and Jersey.

reb*** shares an explanation that the judge and prosecutors uploaded documents through ECF from home without clerks working overtime.

siy*** asks where the latest developments in the Guo case can be viewed.

spr*** asks whether the court proceeding scheduled for the following day is a status conference.

ntp*** clarifies that only public observation of the proceedings was cancelled.

sar*** shares a reference to the United States v. Guo docket number 67012324.

sar*** asks what docket entry 790 refers to.

reb*** explains that docket entries may experience delays rather than being uploaded in real time.

kir*** states that the judge intends to appoint a Special Master.

kir*** contends that the judge is unable to clarify the matter independently.

him*** disputes the idea that the Special Master is appointed to distribute funds.

beg*** questions the timing and intentions behind the Alliance distributing accounts from alleged victims.

kir*** notes that the prosecution brought the indictment.

kir*** contends that the information is almost certainly authentic.

xia*** asks how to join the New Federal State of China.

xia*** describes a personal need for political asylum similar to Edward Snowden.

xia*** asks whether others have looked into Snowden's situation.